this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
1752 points (98.6% liked)

World News

39102 readers
3596 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tygr@lemmy.world 158 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I’ve been “striking” for a long time now, against junk TV in general. There’s an occasional awesome show that delivers but 95% of it is low-effort junk TV like dating, survival, cooking and other shows like it.

I haven’t had live TV in years and it’s quite shocking to see what the average user deals with. Junk TV + ads that play 30% of the time is absolutely insane.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 110 points 1 year ago (4 children)

low-effort junk TV like dating, survival, cooking and other shows like it.

... in other words, exactly the shows that don't use actors or writers

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] blivet@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago (10 children)

I haven’t had live TV in years and it’s quite shocking to see what the average user deals with. Junk TV + ads that play 30% of the time is absolutely insane.

Yeah, I’ve had the same experience. We don’t have live TV, and when we occasionally hang out with friends or family who do I’m always flabbergasted at the frequency and length of ad breaks nowadays, and similarly amazed that despite a nearly endless list of channels there never seems to be anything I actively want to watch.

[–] leapingleopard@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can't believe the people that allow commercials to blare in their living rooms without diving for the remote control like the house is on fire. Is it just me? and they just continue normal conversation like it's somehow possible to hear them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

My parents still have cable TV (I just got them a Roku not long ago, so fingers crossed...), and at this point I can't stand to watch it for more than about one and a half commercial breaks. It's hard to believe anybody willingly subjects themselves to that trash when ad-free alternatives are available.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

You forgot animated sitcom that either lasts 6 episodes or 16 seasons

[–] mmagod@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol only 30%?

jokes but i agree.. i remember going to visit some relatives and sat and watched tv with them.. i too was so shocked at how they'd sit idly thru commercials jarring into their show, slapping them in the face..

i can't stand it. just about anything i watch, when i watch, is commercial free

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 138 points 1 year ago

Lol get fucked Hollywood

UNION STRONG ✊

[–] Jojo-Mcfrost572@kbin.social 130 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Good. More please. Hold these cucks accountable.

Destroying the planet for infinite wealth.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Yeah! I’m sick of it. Not only do they want infinite money but also infinite growth.

Literally like a cancer. Feasting on society until nothing is left.

[–] vimdiesel@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

You wanna get really mad? A new practice they were trying to pull off was bring in some young good looking actors; do 3d body scans, record a bunch of voice data, and then have them allow the studios a perpetual license to use their likeness for a few thousand bucks. How evil is that?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ThinlySlicedGlizzy@lemmy.world 117 points 1 year ago (31 children)

I don't care how fast AI can pump out "high quality content" because I refuse to consume any of it. I really hope the strikes are successful.

[–] RidcullyTheBrown@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (27 children)

If it is high quality, why do you care how it was produced?

But it's not the high quality content that's threatened by AI, it's the mediocre gargabe. It's the endless stream of poor quality TV shows and movies which are produced not as art, but as a means of steady predictibile income for the companies involved. That's the industry aspect of the business. This side of the business consumes most of the talent in the industry. They all know it's not good and they all hope they will get the funding to actually work on the things they know will be high quality. I think AI will allow them to do that.

Further more, this strike is not just about AI. I think this aspect is the one media outlets care most about and gets reported on more. The entertainment industry has suffered a major shift with streaming platforms and the movement of money from production studios to streaming platforms has left the employees behind. They're getting less money from streaming platforms but still do the same work. That's what the strike is about. The industry didn't care for them when it changed.

load more comments (27 replies)
[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

honestly we need legislation that protects artists who use their art as a means to live

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 102 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Fuck hollywood.

This would be good opportunity for people to start new film studios and such, founded on more equal profit sharing. Let greedy pieces of shit shrivel and die without labor to exploit. There is no negotiating with those kinds of people as they will just try to find ways to force and manipulate people to do what they want.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's ironic that Hollywood was created by filmmakers and actors who got tired of being exploited by investors and cinemas alike.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's the circle of ~~liiiiiife~~ capitalism.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vimdiesel@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago (19 children)

This is the best possible outcome. No one wants that AI generated shit while actors and behind the scenes people make starvation wages.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Clown_Tempura@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago

Wow it's almost like people's tolerance for ruthless exploitation isn't infinite. Hollywood's disgusting parasitic grifters can get fucked.

[–] Pokethat@lemm.ee 62 points 1 year ago (27 children)

I honestly don't know how I feel. Most content feels like 'consume our product/content and give us monthly fee' instead of nice shows and movies. Everything seems to have a point where it pulls me out and I find myself questioning if I'm crazy or if everything feels like shit.

There are some amazing gems, but for years it feels like Hollywood has cared less and less about making cool and engaging media and are instead of focusing on manipulating people.

I'm sure the problem is coming from the top, but writers and actors have been pretty shit too

[–] Jordan_the_hutt@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that's in part due to nepotism. It seems like everyone who's successfully in entertainment is the child or grandchild of someone else who was successful in entertainment. The same is true for the music industry and its starting to become true in the AAA gaming industry.

When people start to get those jobs because of their family connections rather than their ability everything goes downhill. The most obvious example outside of entertainment is politics.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PsiOc@lemmy.fmhy.ml 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I'm interested to see how Hollywood evolves post strike. Hoping that this will allow Writers and Actors more agency when making their products rather than having to conform to whatever shitty money grubbing practices that the Execs usually force on them

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] vimdiesel@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Actors and writers use what they're fed, this is 99% on movie execs.

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/BQQpW7TuBy4

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Millie@lemm.ee 57 points 1 year ago (23 children)

What's it going to take to actually do something about these ultra-rich leeches literally destroying our planet and everything good on it to inflate a number in a bank somewhere? How do we actually build up the initiative to stop it?

All our other problems seem largely centered around our inability to appropriately respond to extreme greed. Not only in actually actively stopping it, but in even identifying it or being able to properly censure it in the first place. The moment you start talking about the rich being the cause of our problems, there's a section of society that starts tuning you out. I definitely feel like as things get worse people are starting to catch on, but even once we're there, where do we go?

If we actually get to the point of agreeing that excessive wealth is inherently misanthropic and should be a crime in and of itself, how do we make it a crime while so much power sits in the hands of those who'd be on the losing end of that decision?

I hope the WGA and SAG can spark a change in people's consciousness around labor. I'd honestly love to see a lot more interviews and independent podcasts coming from the picket lines. If there's anyone who can convince Americans to fight for the value of their labor, it's the people write and play the parts in the stories they love.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (15 children)

If you still have the bird app or some other method, send your support of solidarity to your favorite actors. They will definitely appreciate it.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] EmperorHenry@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

I'm glad more and more workers are realizing the power they have over the industries they're working in.

Without the workers, the businesses have nothing. We really need to have a serious revolution before they replace all jobs with AI robots.

[–] Open@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Is $25,000 per annum a living wage LA? To think that these are getting so little is nuts.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WanderingPoltergeist@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Good, I hope more join in and walk until Hollywood caves...They won't like this negative attention. 😁

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

incredibly based. fuck the execs. fucking parasites

[–] CurlyWurlies4All@prxs.site 33 points 1 year ago

Solidarity ✊

Having 20 writers so you don't have to pay them as much really dilutes any narrative structure.

[–] GammaScorpii@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Hollywood is dead anyway. They just make superhero movies for china now

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pineapplefriedrice@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (9 children)

They're fighting a losing battle, but I hope a side effect of it is that new people come in and change both the economics and artistry of Hollywood. Most Hollywood content sits in a very rigid box. It's repetitive, unoriginal, and unappealing. People are encouraged to eat ramen for every meal in order to "make it", simply because far too many of them try (which is partially the result of the "follow your dreams" narrative in America as well). The further down you are, the worse your compensation. Good ideas get missed or thrown out and relegated to dollar theatres all the time.

If this strike goes on long enough that it starts to flush people out, I'm ok with that. Sucks for the people who are going to lose their livelihoods, but for some of them that was an eventuality. Hopefully in the end creators will have more creative freedom and receive more proportional compensation.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] phillycodehound@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Good to see actors, many whom get just the base for their work, stand up for what they deserve.

[–] zombuey@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Fake news, these are all crisis actors. They didn't even try I've seen many of these people in movies!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TendieMaster69@midwest.social 23 points 1 year ago (8 children)

I have mixed feelings about this. I hope they all are compensated fairly, but technology keeps getting better and capitalism latches on to the absolute cheapest solution. If that includes firing most employees and using AI to save billions a year then they will do it. I think this will just excacerbate AI proliferation in the end. Alas, no one gets paid to strike in America.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›