87
submitted 1 year ago by kid2908@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.nz/post/2426645

If elected president, economist Javier Milei has pledged to eliminate government spending on research and shut down the environment and health ministries.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] fraksken@infosec.pub 34 points 1 year ago

These are public electoeal promises? who would vote for that?

[-] JustAnotherRando@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Stupid people.

[-] kid2908@slrpnk.net 27 points 1 year ago

From the article:

To tame the crisis, Milei has proposed not only privatizing science, but also closing the environment and health ministries, and abolishing the current public-health and education systems. The anti-establishment politician has even floated the idea of allowing people to sell their own organs for profit. On environmental issues, he is equally provocative, calling climate change “a socialist hoax”, and saying that a company should be able to pollute a river as it see fit. “From his perspective, any regulatory intervention by the state represents an attack against market freedom and, therefore, against individual freedom,” says Maristella Svampa, a sociologist at the CONICET-funded Center for Documentation and Research of Left-Wing Culture in Buenos Aires.

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

We need an island. A tiny island full of progressives, safe from the rest of the world...

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Sadly they’re killing the whole world.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortunately, so far whenever that has happened, non progressives have generally pretty swiftly ended it.

It seems that it needs to be a very big island of progressives to stand a chance of survival.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Eat the middle class huh? I'm sure it will do wonders for the Argentine economy.

[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hopefully this idiot doesn't get in. Of course he is an "economist" 🙄.

"Simpletons! Yes, yes! I'm a simpleton! Are you a simpleton? We'll build a town and we'll name it Simple Town, because by then all the smart bastards that caused all this, they'll be dead! Simpletons! Let's go! This ought to show 'em! Anybody here not a simpleton? Get the bastard, if there is!"

-A Canticle for Leibowitz, Walter M. Miller, Jr.

this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2023
87 points (96.8% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5197 readers
801 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS