this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
2652 points (99.1% liked)

pics

19744 readers
309 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Martin believes everyone should have access to free quality software.

Thanks so muchπŸ™

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 72 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You don't lose money when people use a competitors service/product over yours. That money wasn't yours to lose.

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Yet, the companies cry about losing money due to online piracy. At this point it's eΕΊtremally funny

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago (12 children)

for me, anyway, they didn't lose money because if i couldn't pirate it, I just wouldn't watch. I'm told this is a common thought process

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not the gotcha you think it is. They said competitors, piracy makes them use your own product and not pay you for it.

Would a kid buy photoshop if they had to? Probably not. Would a sketchy company? Yup.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Completely irrellevant to the discussion and nice ragebait, but whatever.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I don't see how it is. A kid that can't afford to buy photoshop won't buy it any more than a sketchy company would, just like how facebook much rather steal material than pay their way for it. The difference obviously being that the sketch company might very well have the capital to pay their way, they're just used to get away with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago

Tell that to all of the monopolies that have totally captured a market segment.

[–] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Also shouting out Krita as a Photoshop alternative for digital painting, digital art.

https://krita.org/en/

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 3 points 6 days ago

How is its CMYK profiles in your opinion?

[–] illumrial@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

People like him are why I still have hope in tech. May the machine bless him eternally.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Lost dollars because of free software and lost dollars because of piracy are both imaginary numbers.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 14 points 6 days ago

FYI, their Mastodon account is here.

[–] iampivot@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

It seems just fitting that he wears a hat that you need bezier curves to draw perfectly with vector graphics!

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 6 days ago

Ive used both inskape and illustrator and inkscape is better and has been better ux wise since day 1 for me.

[–] NightShot@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Thank you Martin and Inkscape-team!

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Inkscape is good but it can't replace illustrator, especially for the needs of someone willing to pay $1000/year for it

Maybe the affinity suite is more appropriate (ROI in just 2 months of adobe subscription)

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί