this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
857 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

70283 readers
3583 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Owning things like Pocket is fine as long as each product stands on it's own. Melding them together is what upsets their user base.

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

100%. And companies don't seem to realize this. I'll use fakespot, but there is absolutely no use for it to be an inbrowser app, and the fact that it suggests (pushes) the idea each time I use the website is just maddening. That said, I appreciate that service.

Pocket can stay or leave. I don't care one way or the other. I never understood its usecase.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I never understood its usecase.

I used to use it when I was browsing the web at work. If I was reading something at the end of the day, or if it was something I didn't want to read at work, I'd give it a pocket bookmark. Then I could pull out my phone and finish right where I left off during my train commute.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 106 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (17 children)

bUt iT'S jUSt bOoKmARkS

- people who are privileged enough to never have experienced multiple days without an internet connection.

it's a shame to see it go, it's been the first read-it-later service that I was aware of and used. I've moved away to Omnivore (RIP) and then Wallabag (https://wallabag.it/ for 11€/year, but you can self-host it or find someone else to host it for you for a lower fee), but I've still been thinking fondly of it, despite Mozilla clearly trying to force people into social reading rather than just serve as a convenient offline storage of articles.

edit: this post isn't a request for advice, I'm very happy with my current Wallabag setup.

load more comments (17 replies)

Bummer. I can see pocket going, I tried to use it but it’s basically a place to put stuff that you plant to but never actually get around to reading, a bookmark does the same thing. Fakespot I’m not sure about. I’ve used it, but there’s no way to verify how right it is.

[–] Majestic@lemmy.ml 67 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Never cared for pocket and always disabled it as spyware. Fake spot will be missed though.

This is an ill omen however. They’re cutting back dramatically in anticipation of their Google funding being lost forever and perhaps as some suggest in anticipation of enshitifying. These were both sold originally as additional revenue streams for Mozilla.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TAG@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

As an occasional user, I am sad to see it go. Are there any other sites out there to maintain a list of links that I may find useful in the future? With a web UI and not self hosted?

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Never used pocket, how does this differ from just having a bookmarks folder called "stuff to read while you're taking a shit"?

[–] dantheclamman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Pocket saved an offline searchable archive of all of the article text. Multiple times I found articles I saved that were no longer online. So no, it's not the same as bookmarks

[–] Alaknar@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

The difference is in convenience.

On the one hand, you can add a page to your bookmarks, after choosing the correct folder, of course.

On the other hand, you can click a button and a page gets automatically saved in your "read later" storage, with a description, summary, and a preview of the content.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I enjoy pocket for the articles that come up on the new tab page. I’ve never once saved an article for later with it.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good. I never trusted those integrated apps and thought of them as spyware. Mozilla should go back to focusing on making a lean browser and whatever apps they want to offer should be optional instead of hard coded into their flagship product.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

To be fair, I think they both existed as separate products first, before Mozilla bought them. I used both, but they should have never been integrated as a part of a browser...

[–] cascadia99@lemm.ee 74 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I liked Fakespot. Amazon obviously doesn't care whether reviews are legit.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

fuck, I'm using the Pocket plugin a lot :[

not for proper bookmarking, just to mark where I was in longer videos and webcomics, 1 click on/off, easy

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I liked it at first until the recommendations became more-and-more advertorial slop.

[–] SnortsGarlicPowder@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

I used it like 3 times before deciding my read later functionality is already and better served by the 206 tabs I will never look at.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 51 points 1 day ago (7 children)

This shift allows us to shape the next era of the internet – with tools like vertical tabs

T  o  I
h  f  n
e     t
   t  e
F  h  r
u  e  n
t     e
u     t
r
e
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gerowen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pocket is one service of theirs I did use from time to time. Save an article you want to read later without committing it to a bookmark.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Wish they'd make bookmark not suck so much that using them felt like a commitment to organisationnal chores. The bookmark system is largely unchanged since the netscape days.

You cant search texts inside bookmarks because they only store the url. Which will break. Instead of saving the html itself, as if we still only has hundreds of gigabytes.

It should have a library level search system, capable of not just symbol text but intelligent summarization, categorization, search by relecant, content discovery algorithm, rss feed support all fully local, offline capable.

The whole thing, metadata, html, inages, video, files, code, replay of the changes over time. Yes I should be able to replay clicking "read more" as I expand comments on facebook. I should not lose my work to a page reload ever again. And no that's nor "too much space". Web pages are largely text sent super efficiently it is not that much information even compared to a gigabyte.

[–] mr_satan@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (9 children)

What you're describing is so much more difficult from a technical standpoint than you give it credit.

Static pages – sure, the plague of single page applications – oof, that's a challenge.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Artopal@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I use Pocket since before Mozilla bought it. In combination with my kobo ereader, it changed the way I read the Internet for the better. Self hosting is no option for me and as far as I know Pocket was the best free read-it-later service. And the only one that worked seamless with Kobo. I really hope Rakuten buys it.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Noo! I loved Pocket. It's integrated into my Kobo eReader. It was the only good way to get articles easily synced on to an eReader. I hope Kobo buys Pocket. Or Rakuten, since that's a tech company and they own Kobo.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] letsgo@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

I tried pocket a couple of times but couldn't get past the "we think you're on a phone so you're only getting three items on the screen at once". Well I'm not on a phone, I'm on a desktop with a 32" monitor and three T-Rex sized items on my screen is just terrible design.

[–] Bali@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The first paragraph is not true. Mozilla is backed by a billionaire or billionaires, for example Google and Microsoft where the majority of Mozilla revenues comes from them. Stop deceiving people!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 day ago

“Firefox is the only major browser not backed by a billionaire”

This is a misleading statement. 86% of Mozilla’s funding is from google. Modern web browsers are a fucked landscape designed to perpetuate googles dominance

[–] xiao@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›