this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
577 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

70283 readers
3390 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A 2025 Tesla Model 3 in Full-Self Driving mode drives off of a rural road, clips a tree, loses a tire, flips over, and comes to rest on its roof. Luckily, the driver is alive and well, able to post about it on social media.

I just don't see how this technology could possibly be ready to power an autonomous taxi service by the end of next week.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

To be fair, that grey tree trunk looked a lot like a road

[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago

GPS data predicted the road would go straight as far as the horizon. Camera said the tree or shadow was an unexpected 90 degree bend in the road. So the only rational move was to turn 90 degrees, obviously! No notes, no whammies, flawless

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] postnataldrip@lemmy.world 62 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"It crashed!"

"Yes but it did it all by itself!"

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 days ago

Except for the last 0.05 seconds before the crash where the human was put in control. Therefore, the human caused the crash.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It got the most recent update, and thought a tunnel was a wall.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I have visions of Elon sitting in his lair, stroking his cat, and using his laptop to cause this crash. /s

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 11 points 2 days ago

Why would you inflict that guy on a poor innocent kitty?

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That tree cast shade on his brand.

It had to go.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, if Elon was my dad, I'd probably have some suicidal tendencies too.

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 15 points 2 days ago

More like the abusive step-father

[–] RandomStickman@fedia.io 36 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Anything outside of a freshly painted and paved LA roads at high noon while it's sunny isn't ready for self drivings it seems

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I use autopilot all the time on my boat. No way in hell I'd trust it in a car. They all occasionally get suicidal. Mine likes to lull you into a sense of false security, then take a sharp turn into a channel marker or cargo ship at the last second.

[–] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. My car doesn’t have AP, but it does have a shed load of sensors and sometimes it just freaks out about stuff being too close to car for no discernible reason. Really freaks me out as I’m like what you see bro we just driving down the motorway.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

For mine, it’s the radar seeing the retro-reflective stripes on utility poles being brighter than it expects.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Isn't there a plane whose autopilot famously keeps trying to crash into the ground. The general advice is to just not let it do that, whenever it looks like it's about to crash into the ground, pull up instead.

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

All the other answers here are wrong. It was the Boeing 737-Max.

They fit bigger, more fuel efficient engines on it that changed the flight characteristics, compared to previous 737s. And so rather than have pilots recertify on this as a new model (lots of flight hours, can't switch back), they designed software to basically make the aircraft seem to behave like the old model.

And so a bug in the cheaper version of the software, combined with a faulty sensor, would cause the software to take over and try to override the pilots and dive downward instead of pulling up. Two crashes happened within 5 months, to aircraft that were pretty much brand new.

It was grounded for a while as Boeing fixed the software and hardware issues, and, more importantly, updated all the training and reference materials for pilots so that they were aware of this basically secret setting that could kill everyone.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Being 787 Max did that when the sensor got faulty and there was no redundancy for the sensor's because that was in an optional addon package

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They have auto pilot on boats? I never even thought about that existing. Makes sense, just never heard of it until just now!

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

They've had it forever. Tie a rope to the wheel. Presto. Autopilot.

[–] KayLeadfoot@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

I'll point this post out to Wall Street Bets, Maersk stock will pop 10%+ overnight.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They've technically had autopilots for over a century, the first one was the oil tanker J.A Moffett in 1920. Though the main purpose of it is to keep the vessel going dead straight as otherwise wind and currents turn it, so using modern car terms I think it would be more accurate to say they have lane assist? Commercial ones can often do waypoint navigation, following a set route on a map, but I don't think that's very common on personal vessels.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Why someone will be a passenger in self-driving vehicle? They know that they are a test subjects, part of a "Cartrial" (or whatever should be called)? Self-Driving is not reliable and not necessery. Too much money is invested in something that is "Low priority to have". There are prefectly fast and saf self-driving solutions like High-speed Trains.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 days ago

Full Self-Destruct

[–] KingCake_Baby@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Don't drive Tesla

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I am never getting into a self driving car. I don't understand why we are investing money into this technology when people can already drive cars on their own, and we should be moving towards robust public transportation systems anyway. A waste of time and resources to... what exactly? Stare at your phone for a few extra minutes a day? Work from home and every city having robust electric transit systems is what the future is supposed to be.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not a fan of self driving cars, but saying that people are able to drive cars is a stretch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] underline960@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Back when I still believed, I was excited because I wanted get in my car and take a 90-minute nap until I arrived at work.

With public transportation, you can only be half-asleep or you'll miss your stop.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 2 days ago

I used to dream of watching a movie then falling asleep in bed while my car drove the 8 hours to my folks' house.

But I'd want that beast to be bristling with sensors of every kind. None of this "cameras only" idiocy.

Someday. Maybe.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sidtirouluca@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago (8 children)

self driving is the future, but im glad im not a beta tester.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] tfm@europe.pub 8 points 2 days ago

"I'm confident that Save full self driving (SFSD) will be ready next year"

[–] yoshisaur@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›