this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
18 points (72.5% liked)

movies

3937 readers
357 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Per Deadline:

Then, there’s an IMAX/3D re-release of James Cameron’s Avatar: The Way of Water, which is set for October 3, 2025 — ahead of threequel Avatar: Fire and Ash on December 19, which is expected to do gangbusters business, on the heels of a historically successful first two films.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Randomfolk20@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Wow can't wait

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I pirated this movie. I made it 10 minute in before I turned it off and deleted the file. One of the most banal pieces of shit I've ever turned off.

[–] trungulox@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So. You’ll hear no argument from me on how banal the thing is. The setting, the plot, the characters. None of it does anything particularly engaging.

But holy fucking shit this movie and the one before it were breathtaking visual spectacles that I’ve not seen before or since.

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

I'll agree with you on the first one. My friend wanted to see it and we saw it in 3D - which I usually avoid. I was blown away by the visuals and actually saw it a second time in theatre about a week later with someone else. I kind of didn't even pay much attention to the plot and dialogue. I just wanted the visuals.

It wasn't until I saw it a third time at home without the visuals that I realized just how stupid the movie was.

[–] keyez@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

This comment section gonna be fun

[–] cobysev@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago
[–] hydrashok@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] golli@lemm.ee 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

Nah, that was avatar 1.

It honestly didn’t look that much better.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 8 points 17 hours ago

Man, that was a bro movie

Unless they drop that absurd dynamic frame rate, that's going to be a 'no' from me. It turned millions of dollars worth of top tier post-production into something cringy by YouTube standards. I'm not arguing that everything needs to be 24 fps. Hell, film it at 60 for all I care, but that back and forth is extremely distracting and cheap-lookong.