this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2023
25 points (96.3% liked)

UK Politics

3084 readers
173 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Jaccident@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It looks like his bus pass from Uni.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

It's a mugshot and a half.

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Little point in voting in elections if all parties have the same policies. Labour exists to give the impression we have choice. We don’t.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's kind of what the Tory press want - if they can't get you enthusiastic to vote Conservative, then they want to suppress the vote by driving home that they are all as bad as each other.

After a dozen years of this shitshow it is clear that this isn't the case and any one of the line of Labour leaders would have saved the country a lot of pain if voted it, no matter what your feelings on Corbyn or the fact that Ed Miliband once ate a sandwich a bit weirdly.

Starmer is a personality vacuum and deeply uninspiring but, even if he performs exactly to most people's low expectations, he'll be orders of magnitude better than whatever robber baron stands against him.

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When I'm in the voting booth do I pretend that Starmer has broken every promise he made to his own party? That he's not going to provide universal free school meals? That he's going to continue the child benefit cap? He's ditched the party's green plans? And whatever right-wing nonsense he spouts before the GE?

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago

Personally, I'll be voting to get the Tories out. I'd vote for a rabid badger whose one policy was that he was going to come round and eat my face (which is refreshingly honest).

My ideal solution would be that Labour get in but without a large enough majority that they can wave bills through parliament and have to do deals that mean proper electoral reform. I'm not quite sure how to engineer such an outcome, so (this side of him surprising us with a raft of secret radical policies he's been hiding so as not to give the media a stick to beat him with) I am hoping he underperforms to such an extent that someone like Andy Burnham has to intervene and challenge him.

However, as long as my main aim (Tories Out) is accomplished then things will be better than they are now. That's a really low bar but it's a base to build from.

[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That isn't what he said..

He states what he would like to do but sidesteps the question when asked directly what payrise offer he would make. His message is focused on growing the economy.

I think its expectation management, I think he sees his first few years as firefighting and he won't make promises he can't keep.

Labours message on the NHS was focused on rolling back privatisation, then it suddenly stopped and became about bed blocking and staff shortages.

I don't think Starmer suddenly decided privatisation was good, its more bed blocking is eating NHS resources and there is a 30,000 staff shortage.

Those are critical issues which if left will cause the NHS to collapse, so if you know you won't have time to address something like privatisation it makes sense not to promise to remove it.

[–] TerryCustard@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah they’re 18% ahead in the polls. It would be foolish to make any promises at this point - he doesn’t need to and only risks giving the cons attack headlines and losing votes. Until they have to produce a manifesto and while the tories continue to self destruct, these are the sorts of statements / interviews you’re going to get.

[–] Tweak@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a choice, albeit a choice between a douche and a turd sandwich. Neither are appealing, but at least a douche is cleansing, while a turd sandwich just fills you full of shit.

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can't see that Starmer is even a douche. It's all shit!

[–] fleacircus@lemmy.fmhy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't be so pessimistic -- you can have a red neoliberal or a blue neoliberal. What more could you want?

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago

Could I have a mix of both? With nuts on top and a flake?

[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Sir Keir insists that his promise to reform public services is bold and focuses on long-term solutions rather than quick fixes

UK is so 'effed.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Inflation at 3-10% over the last few years
Population 10% higher every 10 years
"Nah, we can keep costs at the same level as the 90s, no problem"

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem is with the current government and not the next to come. They have broken the country. There is only so much you can do after an episode with such a corrupt group in power.

[–] Wooly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, everything I've heard about Starmer is pretty awful too. He just sounds like another Tory, it's sad how few different options we have.

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

O aye in what way? Do you really think we should continue with the current set of thieves?

[–] Wooly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the way he basically doesn't stand for anything and keeps saying he will continue austerity by not giving public workers raises.

Obviously I'm taking him over Sunak, but he's one of the worst alternatives I've seen in my voting career.

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

I am not a Labour supporter. I am very much anti-tory. I see Tories as nothing more than thieves. Labour is the most obvious choice to remove the scum we have now. What I would really want to see is a PR voting implementation. Remove the dominance of the two main parties. The system is far too easily to corrupt atm. Hearing that Starmer met with Murdoch filled me with dread. First port of call has to be to take the best option to remove the thieves we have currently.

[–] tenebrisnox@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

After World War Two and a broken, penniless Britain, Labour introduced the Welfare State. This country was still on rations but the Labour leadership knew that there needed to be radical change and had a vision of a better Britain. Worrying that they couldn’t afford it wasn’t an option.

That’s what we need now - especially so at a time of climate catastrophe - but Starmer’s Labour Party refuse to do so.

load more comments
view more: next ›