this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
895 points (90.7% liked)

196

3297 readers
2358 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Right wing men aren't lonely. They have community. They have validation. They have support. Thats why lonely men go to the right.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 32 points 2 days ago
[–] Manticore@lemmy.nz 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Every time I see this meme format I'm a little frustrated and sad.

A long time ago, Cosmo did a bunch of studies on dating app users. It published a bunch of their results and people have been miscounting it ever since to serve their assumptions.

On dating apps, when one woman matches with one man, 90% of women match with 10% of men. This is largely a result of the app populations, which were and are mostly men. Unless you're okay with your girl dating ~9 men at once, dating apps will only match a small percentage of men, because that's how maths works.

When asked to judge dating app profile pictures (no other profile information), women judged men's pictures lower than men judged women's. This is as much a factor of the profile pictures we choose as anything else. In addition, men's match preferences had a strong relationship with their attraction ranks. Whereas for women the relationship was weaker, and the content of the profile was a larger deciding factor. But people hear about the judging profile photos thing and go 'women are more critical of appearance than men are -> women are shallow'.

When asked 'what age are [men/women] most atteactive', women tended to answer close to their own age (with a drop off around 50). Most men said 20-25. But most men saying still typically matched close to their own age. Much like the women with profile pictures, they were trying to answer a direct question with what they believed was a critical, scientific, 'objective' answer, rather than reflecting their own dating preferences. But now women fear (or believe) that any men will not find them attractive as they age.

There's a lot of interesting things in those findings, if you acknowledge it is specifically measuring dating app users, had nuanced findings, and was not scientifically robust in the first place. It's broad conclusions DO NOT apply to the population as a whole.

And I ache a little each time I see its conclusions reduced and misused to justify misanthropy. Much like the myth of 'the alpha wolf', it's misinformation that refuses to die.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Dating apps are social cancer

Make friends with women, jumping straight to “romance” with zero friendship is like running a relationship on insane difficulty

[–] CMonster@discuss.online 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't agree with this. They are a stream-lined method to meet other people who are interested in making new contacts without going out of their comfort zone. I also may be biased since I met my s/o on Bumble but we are 6 years in and this is the healthiest most loving relationship I've ever been in. I know my experience is most likely the exception rather than the norm YMMV

Also I don't know how going on a few dates with someone is "jumping right to romance"

[–] uniquethrowagay@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

Dating apps are quite horrible, but I would have never met my girlfriend without them. We are both very shy and agree that even if we had met by chance, nobody would have ever made a move.

None of my women friends are romantically interesting to me and I'm not the kind of person who meets a lot of new people. I'm very happy with my small circle of friends and neither my job nor my hobbies expose me to new people.

A dating app helped me to work around that. I was very lucky though and the first person I met with turned out to be the perfect match for me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LongboardingLad@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm always super hesitant to comment on stuff like this because I don't want to be lumped in with the fascists but I'm going to break that rule just this once. When people hear "Male Loneliness Epidemic", it means different things to different people. It appears to me as most left leaning people hear, "I don't have a woman that caters to me and my needs". For myself it means, "I don't have a Support System of friends and family to lean on." A partner would be great but I would get far greater satisfaction in gaining a group of friends or a sense of belonging. Paired with likely Autism and ADHD, things aren't super rad for me on any aspect of life. That's all my own stuff to deal with though.

The takeaway is I hope anyone reading this is doing okay, regardless of gender. I may not get the struggles of your life, but I hope you are overcoming them.

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I think there is a general loneliness epidemic, but it’s particularly acute with men who were never pressured or given the opportunity to develop the skills necessary to build and maintain a community around them.

Like the systems and environments that used to facilitate this no longer exist, and it is left to individuals to do it them selves, something impossible without those skills. Those institutions and systems that used to facilitate community building have been pivoted to profit or dismantled if they couldn’t generate profit or if they were actively undermining the profitability of something else.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

When you tell most men their problem is they don’t have any friends not that they don’t have a girlfriend they take that very personally and reject the idea

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world 57 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Not even remotely true. Reminder that Trump won white women voters in 2024.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Those are pink women

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] gxgx55@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Painting all lonely men as douches is kind of fucked up, no?

[–] gandalf_der_12te@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah it's really invidating and alienating young men.

Liberals wonder why young men flock to the conservative, and then they say stuff that's just very invalidating. Like, if you want to convince somebody, you have to make an attractive offer. Instead, it feels as if today's "feminists" are just blaming everything bad in the world on men. Even though your neighbor man has exactly zero responsibility for the world at large.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Yeah you're right, I'm only alone because Im garbage, thanks for that reassurance.

[–] AHuman2@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

This post is such a stupid take on a very complex issue. Most of the problem is related to economic-socio problem. If everyone can get a $100k/year job that solves a whole bunch of problems in itself. It's hard to convince someone to date if we are only earning like 25k/year. Some women are going no thanks I will take a chance with an old guy who maybe divorced but seems financially settled. Then comes introverts/anxiety problems, etc. these dudes have a hard time even approaching women because they may get humiliated. Then comes looks, only around 30-40% people are tall enough and good looking enough to get chosen with no effort instantly.

Add all these and we have like 55% dudes below the age of 30 with no partner.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 95 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (12 children)

This is absolutely a major contributing factor, but there's more to it than this. Everybody is lonely, pretty much regardless of gender. This issue hurts everyone.

And it is also caused in part because of how fucked up we've designed our society. It's nearly impossible to make friends as an adult because

  • we're all working too much to have the free time for it
  • there are (effectively) no third places where you can hang out with the expectation to meet people without the expectation of spending money
  • to get anywhere you generally need a car, highways and roads divide and spread everything which makes walking or biking difficult
  • social media is run for profit, not for the sake of actually connecting people
  • these above issues feed into the issue OP is pointing out. If you are lonely and your life isn't going too well, then you're gonna seek answers for this complicated issue. And fascists are all too willing to take advantage and provide simple answers. It then turns into a self feeding cycle.

I'm sure there's a bunch of other reasons too, but those are the ones of the top of my sleep deprived head. Even if all the above awful values men have disappeared, the above problems would still need to be fixed.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also to add to the list:

  • As third-places don't exist without paying for things, more socialisation has moved online where intimate connections are not as deep as inperson so the connections are weaker and don't last as long.

  • Internet socialising has a tendency to form echo chambers and social bubbles so interacting with new people with different perspectives, even online, is more difficult which is eroding socialising skills.

  • Dating sites and apps have capitalized on this loss of places to meet people and most of these platforms are controlled by a single entity: Match Group.

  • Match Group are explicitly making the dating experience worse for both men and women because it makes more money for them and they have little to no competition.

It goes like this: women get overwhelmed by the sheer volume of messages and harassed on the platform, women leave those platforms, fewer % of women on the platform, men then pay money to get more potential matches, women get overwhelmed, and therefore the cycle repeats.

At least that's my impression from the experience I have had and observed when asking my women friends about it. Not sure how the experience is for those looking for non-hetrosexual relationships, please comment below how it's similar or different for other groups.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] frankpsy@lemm.ee 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I really feel like this is an idea that needs to die. Plenty of abusive and hateful men seem to have no problems with getting the type of relationships they want; this just inadvertently promotes the idea that one needs to be a 'nice guy' in order to have a relationship. Not every guy who leans left succeeds in wooing a woman, and right wingers complaining about where the women are at are probably in circles with primarily left-leaning women and they need to go look in a church or country concert or something.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 118 points 3 days ago

I wish this was accurate. There would be a lot less fascists.

[–] Canonical_Warlock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 80 points 3 days ago (4 children)

So if I'm a lonely guy it can only be because I'm a sack of shit. Cool cool. Love that. Great for the self esteem.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Unfortunately there are a lot of similarly awful women, especially in more rural and suburban areas.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

True. Never forget that conservative women exist and they can be highly unpleasant.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Don’t date them either!

[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago

But you have no meme for that, so how can we believe you?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I am a moderately liberal guy, and I cannot get any girls. I'm shorter than average and socially awkward. I've managed to get a few dates from dating apps but none of them went anywhere because I'm so awkward in person.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] trungulox@lemm.ee 34 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So. Counterpoint to this, in that I think those guys should just keep doing what they’re doing.

The bar is so low all I need to do is show up on a date and not say anything racist and I’m in.

In fact: y’all should go even harder with the douchebaggery.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The fascists go for a predatory numbers game, hitting up as many women as possible while hoping they find ones vulnerable enough to get roped into an abusive relationship. It's a strategy that breaks down against women who socially reinforce self respect amongst each other. Of course, this isn't unique, as fascism similarly recruits vulnerable men who struggle with self respect. It's abuse and cruelty all the way down.

[–] sudneo@lemm.ee 42 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There are plenty of women in far right/neo-fascist etc. groups, and often people from those groups have relationships with other people from those groups. Your comment gives very much the impression that only males are fascists, which is absolutely not my experience dealing with Forza Nuova/Casapound people (both neo-fascists parties) in my youth.

I also see the male loneliness epidemic as an orthogonal problem to males being fascists, but that's yet another topic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 33 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Please, don't be dismissive of a real problem just because people you (rightfully) hate are disproportionately more affected.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 3 days ago

Instructions unclear, turned into an insufferable Marxist and now I don't have anyone to talk to

load more comments
view more: next ›