this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
267 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

70493 readers
2518 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Only if the also take the full legal responsibility for the AIs actions.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

The business model IS dodging any kind of responsibility so... yeah, I think they'll pass.

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 11 points 8 hours ago

They don’t even take responsibility for things now.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I think AI is positioned to make better decisions than execs. The money saved would be huge!

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The money saved goes where?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It goes to pay off the debt of all of the nations in the world and will then usher in a new age of peace, obviously.

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 hours ago

Haha. That says it all.

[–] philpo@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

In the other news: Meta pays another 3 billion Euro due to not following the DSA and getting banned in Europe.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 18 points 1 day ago

Well hey that actually sounds like a job AI could be good at. Just give it a prompt like "tell me there are no privacy issues because we don't care" and it'll do just that!

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

That's gonna end well😉

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Honestly, I've always thought the best use case for AI is moderating NSFL content online. No one should have to see that horrific shit.

[–] brorodeo@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

Bsky already does that.

[–] towerful@programming.dev 1 points 2 hours ago

Yup.
It's a traumatic job/task that gets farmed to the cheapest supplier which is extremely unlikely to have suitable safe guards and care for their employees.

If I were implementing this, I would use a safer/stricter model with a human backed appeal system.
I would then use some metrics to generate an account reputation (verified ID, interaction with friends network, previous posts/moderation/appeals), and use that to either: auto-approve AI actions with no appeals (low rep); auto-approve AI actions with human appeal (moderate rep); AI actions must be approved by humans (high rep).

This way, high reputation accounts can still discuss & raise awareness of potentially moderatable topics as quickly as they happen (think breaking news kinda thing). Moderate reputation accounts can argue their case (in case of false positives). Low reputation accounts don't traumatize the moderators.

[–] head_socj@midwest.social 3 points 21 hours ago

Agreed. These jobs are overwhelmingly concentratedin developing nations and pay pathetic wages, too.

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What about false positives? Or a process to challenge them?

But yes, I agree with the general idea.

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago

They will probably use the YouTube model - “you’re wrong and that’s it”.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 day ago

Or a process to challenge them?

😂😂😂😔

[–] HowAbt2day@futurology.today 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] blargle@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Not sufficiently fascist leaning. It's coming, Palantir's just waiting for the go-ahead...

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Meta:

Here, AI. Watch all the horrible things humans are capable of and more for us. Make sure nothing gets through.

AI:

becomes SKYNET

[–] HowdWeGetHereAnyways@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ouija boards made of databases don't really think

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] HowdWeGetHereAnyways@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

No, they give you an answer that should sound correct enough to enable them to score a positive interaction.

Why do you think so many GPT answers seem plausible but don't work? Because it has very very little actual logic

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

very very little actual logic

To be precise, 0.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Expecting current gen tool to be as smart as humans? Doesn't mean they're useless. They can translate words to images and explain art in terms of business.

They add capabilities not replace.

[–] leftzero@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They add capabilities not replace.

They poison all repositories of knowledge with their useless slop.

They are plummeting us into a dark age which we are unlikely to survive.

Sure, it's not the LLMs fault specifically, it's the bastards who are selling them as sources of information instead of information-shaped slop, but they're still being used to murder the future in the name of short term profits.

So, no, they're not useless. They're infinitely worse than that.

[–] And009@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 hours ago

Hear me out, Ollama.

I don't disagree, but this is a wildfire of interest right now and there's a lot of people not recognizing this facet of how gpts operate. You have to really vocally recognize it's weakness so it can be mitigated (hopefully).

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Great move for Facebook. It'll let them claim they're doing something to curb horrid content on the platform without actually doing anything.

[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

The marketing behind AI must feel like a runners high. “Something has AI”

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

dont forget censoring their critics under the guise of "violence"

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 23 points 1 day ago

moderation on facebook? i'm sure it can be found right next to bigfoot

(other than automated immediate nipple removal)

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This might be the one time I'm okay with this. It's too hard on the humans that did this. I hope the AI won't "learn" to be cruel from this though, and I don't trust Meta to handle this gracefully.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

pretty common misconception about how “AI” works. models aren’t constantly learning. their weights are frozen before deployment. they can infer from context quite a bit, but they won’t meaningfully change without human intervention (for now)

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, you could hire people who would otherwise enjoy the things they moderate. Keep em from doing shit themselves.

But, if all the sadists, psychos, and pedos were moderating, it would be reddit, I guess.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

My guess is you dont know how bad it is. These people at Meta has real PTSD, and it would absolutly benefit everyone, if this in any way could be automatic with AI.

Next question is though, do you trust Meta to moderate? Nah, should be an independent AI, they couldnt tinker with.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

A bold strategy, Cotton

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh man, I may have to stop using this fascist sewer hose.

[–] wwb4itcgas@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

I've never had a horse in this race, and I never will - but I'm sure this will work out well for those who do. /s

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Following Tumblr's lead, I see...

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Would be a shame if people had so sift through AI generated gore before the bots like and comment it. But seriously, good on them.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

great idea..!