this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
11 points (92.3% liked)

LocalLLaMA

3018 readers
10 users here now

Welcome to LocalLLaMA! Here we discuss running and developing machine learning models at home. Lets explore cutting edge open source neural network technology together.

Get support from the community! Ask questions, share prompts, discuss benchmarks, get hyped at the latest and greatest model releases! Enjoy talking about our awesome hobby.

As ambassadors of the self-hosting machine learning community, we strive to support each other and share our enthusiasm in a positive constructive way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

AI bros won't hype this up for the news for sure, but 480x energy doesn't sound optimistic enough for replacement.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kadup@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

LLMs don't have reasoning nor internal logic. If you take a look at the "thinking" feature AIs like Gemini introduced, this becomes even more obvious. In order to have the most basic type of analysis possible, it must hallucinate an entire context window to force the language model to reach a specific conclusion.

There's zero world in which LLMs replace humans. They might, temporarily, be convincing enough to trick a few CEOs... But that period of time won't last long.

Now, a human being assisted by AI on Microsoft Word or their Python IDE, sure.

[–] Goten@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

extrapolate. what in 10 years?

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If they're still LLMs? Nothing much changes.

[–] thickertoofan@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

as i've read somewhere, finite state machines cannot be sentient, or "intelligent" as we expect them to be. An LLM can not learn new things once trained. I'm waiting for a new breakthrough in this field, to be fully convinced about getting replaced.

[–] Goten@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13763

new papers come out by the hour (literally) and i cant keep up. xD

[–] Goten@piefed.social -1 points 2 days ago

or rather ask ai, it can give a better answer than me. xD

[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 5 points 2 days ago

I'm not sure about the significance of this preprint. Writing energy-efficient sorting algorithms and lab course example code is a very specific problem. It doesn't say a lot about AI in general. Also: Did they forget to tell the AI it's supposed to write energy-efficient code? I didn't read the entire paper. But the prompt example doesn't look like it's in there.

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

I don't value these papers very highly. Before they are even published/peer reviewed, the landscape have changed. Models get better quickly, agentic frameworks too, and their code even more. But good to have a ball-park measurement tho.

If we see what is coming from the latest papers, ('discover ai' on the tube), we have only scratched the surface of how this is going to pan out. Buckle up..

[–] Goten@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

the reality is that we will just produce more powaaaaa for ai.