this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
311 points (99.4% liked)

politics

23730 readers
2478 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 102 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Most government departments have full offices whose purpose is to eliminate waste. Donald Trump fired a lot of them.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 46 points 3 days ago (1 children)

One man's waste is another man's grift

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

Trump’s waist is another man’s girth.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Firing a bunch of people to make things more efficient NEVER works. It costs more money and it bottlenecks all processes. Trump is an idiot, musk is an idiot.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

But it makes great TV

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.com 63 points 3 days ago

I have worked for absolutely huge government departments, and in private industry doing the same thing

The private sector did the job with fewer people sometimes, but the costs to the government were astronomical and the profits went offshore

Working for the government department meant more people were spending their money in the local economy

I know which one was better for society, and if it wasn't for people getting sweet deals to contract out works, then it would all have been government run, the way it should always have been

[–] wwb4itcgas@lemm.ee 35 points 3 days ago

Ah, he made the cardinal mistake of trying to do the stated job instead of what he was told. Did he mistakenly think that he wasn't working for a bunch of neo-feudalistic fascists?

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well I mean what do you expect. I mean this sincerely. If your job is to supposedly to reduce wasteful expenses and you're not finding them: you're the wasteful expense. Mission accomplished.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Kinda like auditors who can't find anything so they make up shit so they can write a report and justify their role.

[–] rottenmummy@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 days ago

I can't even pretend that I am shocked

Is OP a bot?