this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2025
941 points (99.0% liked)

politics

23874 readers
3174 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive article: https://archive.ph/HvFFZ

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (5 children)

If one of them says, "Well Harris was/would be worse!", explain the concept of Schodinger's Cat to them; in a universe where Harris was never President, you can't say shit about what she would have done.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Nah, they don't want to become a target. They'll wait until it blows up on the streets, then point and say 'see?'. Meanwhile, the public is waiting for the congressmen to do something. It's something to watch.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 18 points 4 days ago

DAMMIT! We WERE going to have Him RUN for President but now we need to Find Someone ELSE! Is Charlie Kirk's pal GAVIN NEWSOM around?

-The DNC LITERALLY!

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 days ago

And let me tell you, you do not want to be roadkill with this administration.

[–] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 13 points 4 days ago

I like how even mainstream politicians openly cuss now but we still censor their shit in online news articles... Whos fucking sensibilities are they worried about offending exactly if they dont censor words?

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 11 points 4 days ago

Attack attack attack! No mercy! Down with TACO Don, down with the MAGA fascists!

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I’m trying, Tim.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Starts with you, coach. Until I see you on your soap box beating these shit heels with a bag of nickels you are just blowing hot air.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›