this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
1265 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

14897 readers
2612 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Case@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I used to ask my dad where we were on car trips.

"Directly above the center of the earth." Thanks asshole.

[–] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

That's a good one *takes notes

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] borax7385@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Top left corner is the Weddell Sea so we know it’s somewhere in that direction

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago

everybody know "top-left" means north-west ! just say that !

[–] Bluewing@discuss.online 5 points 1 day ago

I don't know where his ship is, but the man had great taste in blended Scotch! If you run across a bottle of Shackleton in your local liqueur store, buy it.

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Better north of antarctica than north of arctica.

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m good with it. Keep it somewhat hidden. Once the position gets out, every asshat with a scuba tank and calls themselves “an explorer” will ruin the place.

[–] rockstarmode@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

asshat with a scuba tank

3000 meters beneath the Weddell Sea

Good luck

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someone will try it don’t worry.

That or some billionaire will send private subs down to it.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

From what I’ve read, billionaires need more private sub trips

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Here I’ll help, it’s also south of the North Pole.

[–] daddycool@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

And west of the equator.

[–] AnalogNotDigital@lemmy.wtf 1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

It's like a basic reading comprehension thing....

The ship is located in the Weddell Sea, which is north of Antarctica.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

Or south from the Equator line.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

they're saying everywhere outside Antarctica is north of Antarctica, so that doesn't add anything. it's deliberately obtuse for humorous effect. basic joke comprehension should be a thing.

[–] garlicandonions@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I appreciate the "perhaps", like, the headline qualifies how annoyed they are at imprecision.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (26 children)

Mark here either has poor reading comprehension, or is intentionally being a little shit by cherry picking part of the title and not reading the whole thing.

The location specified is not 'north of Antarctica'.

It is, 'the Weddell Sea, north of Antarctica.'

Giving 'the Weddell Sea' as the location is actually decently specific, and the 'north of Antarctica' that follows is modifying / adding to the description of 'the Weddell Sea'... not the entirety of the location description.

I would snarkily, rhetorically, ask if people are even taught how to diagram out a sentence structure anymore, but I already know the answer is 'not really, no', because the average adult American literacy level is that of a 6th grader.

Mark, and anyone else who also finds this to be a funny, poignant zinger, need to go back to middle school and relearn grammar.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could you enlighten me, then? How on earth does "north of Antarctica" modifiy or add to "the Weddell Sea" in any way, shape, or form?

[–] andyspam@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

The Endurance has been found, 3000 metres beneath the Weddell Sea, [which is]north of Antarctica.

See nonrestrictive modifiers

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

I'm wondering if you fail to realize that the entirety of the antarctic coast is "north of Antarctica" which makes the description a virtually useless modifier.

Nothing wrong with the grammar, just the logic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Weddell sea is good, mentioning Antarctica is good, the word “North” is meaningless in this context which is what the OP is laughing about.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 day ago

It should probably say, "off the Antarctic coast", or even "X kilometers off the Antarctic coast".

[–] SloganLessons@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Or - bear with me here - it’s just a funny detail and people are laughing about it. Because any sea is obviously going to be north of it

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is still valid to point out that "north of Antartica" is a silly phrase in context, even though it's fine given the more specific Weddell Sea information. If you did want to help readers know the story based on a more well-known landmark, a less silly phrase would have been simply been "Weddell Sea, near Antarctica".

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

I'd go with "the Antarctic's Weddell Sea".

[–] Tja@programming.dev 25 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Nope. You could as well say: Mediterranean Sea, north of Antarctica.

I have two dollars, less than infinity.

The temperature is pleasant, higher than absolute zero.

Doesn't add anything. There are no seas south of Antarctica.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] p3n@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

The Weddell Sea, north of Antarctica, brought to you by the department of redundancy department.

[–] dmention7@lemm.ee 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

While you're not wrong, you're also massively over-analyzing and "WELL AKSHULLY"ing what appears to be a silly one-liner, not a serious attempted dunk on the article.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Prime "AKSHUALLY" moment.

[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

You better believe I'm here for this squabbling

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can construct a weird true statement from this: All continents besides Antarctica are located North of the South-Pole.

[–] Ashelyn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Technically, almost all of Antarctica is located north of the south pole

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 2 points 23 hours ago

If the south pole is a point, then it has no surface area, so the entirety of antartica is located north of the south pole

load more comments
view more: next ›