612
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

House Republicans haven’t been terribly successful at many things this year. They struggled to keep the government open and to keep the United States from defaulting on its debt. They’ve even struggled at times on basic votes to keep the chamber functioning. But they have been very good at one thing: regicide.

On Friday, Republicans dethroned Jim Jordan as their designated Speaker, making him the third party leader to be ousted this month. First, there was Kevin McCarthy, who required 15 different ballots to even be elected Speaker and was removed from office by a right-wing rebellion at the beginning of October. Then, after a majority of Republicans voted to make McCarthy’s No. 2, Steve Scalise, his successor, a number of Republicans announced that they, too, would torpedo his candidacy and back Jordan instead. Finally, once Republicans finally turned to Jordan as their candidate, the largest rebellion yet blocked him from becoming Speaker. After losing three successive votes on the floor, the firebrand lost an internal vote to keep his position as Speaker designate on Friday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works 156 points 1 year ago

The Republicans started an ill-advised conflict without an exit strategy? Who could've seen that coming!

Surprisingly (and I think this is the problem), none of them.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 year ago

The ones who voted against McCarthy’s ouster might have seen this coming. (Though plenty just wanted to keep the shitty status quo that was keeping Ukraine unfunded).

I was really nervous that the Dems fucked up in voting him out, and that we’d end up with a worse speaker (like Jordan), but been pleasantly relieved by the holdouts who seem to want a slightly less insane speaker.

[-] OpenStars@kbin.social 136 points 1 year ago

They’ve even struggled at times on basic votes to keep the chamber functioning.

You seem to be assuming that proper functioning was their goal. They were sent there to tear it all down, which is precisely what they did. Never forget that they play by an entirely different set of rules.

[-] seaQueue@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not to mention all of their dysfunction and obstruction is just a smoke screen so the wealthy can continue extracting wealth from our economy and offshoring it. Republicans are in government to ensure that the status quo does not change unless it's for the benefit of the ultra wealthy or fundamentally religious.

The Republican end game is to turn the USA into something resembling Mexico or India where the wealthy can do whatever they like at our expense.

[-] OpenStars@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

Except that many who support it do not know that is the goal. They think it's about morality somehow, like abortion=murder but somehow school shootings are meh, whatever.

Religion getting involved in politics doesn't always lead to a bad outcome - e.g. that's how slaves were freed in the UK - but it sure does create a pipeline where people can be fed whatever misinformation, anti-vax, anti-science, anti-facts, etc. Ironically Jesus Himself says things like "don't put heavy burdens onto others without offering to help them", "workers deserve their (living) wages,... that very same day that they work even so don't withhold it for days just bc it is convenient for you - they also have needs and you must be considerate of them", and my personal favorite, "test EVERYTHING against what you KNOW to be true" i.e. be skeptical, but unfortunately Christians aren't listening to Jesus anymore so much as whatever they are fed from the pulpit.:-(

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oops can't fund school lunches or ukraine defense if there's no functioning house, whooops! oh no, who could have seen this coming (cues howler monkey greene)

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 109 points 1 year ago

Less that they don't know HOW to end it and more that they don't WANT it to end.

They are perfectly happy with a non-functional government, it's what they have wanted all along. The less that actively gets done, the happier they are.

Look at Jim Jordan - 16 years in the House, ZERO bills passed.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

The incompetence is the point.

They sell their voters a vision of a swamp filled with child molesting, corrupt politicians and the they fulfill that vision once elected.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

"Government is broken! Elect me and I'll show you!" ;)

[-] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I hate to say this, but doing nothing is the low bar, regressing a medium bar, and fascism the targer.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rolder@reddthat.com 16 points 1 year ago

I feel like they have gone too far off the deep end recently. You have to present some modicum of competency to get elected, usually, even if you just plan on shitting the place up.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Competent leadership went out the window with the rise of the Tea Party over a decade ago now and it's only gotten worse.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago

They struggled to keep the government open and to keep the United States from defaulting on its debt.

Writer seems to misunderstand, it was never the goal of the Republicans to do either of those things. Those were threats they were making unless they got their way.

Frankly if Republicans are caught in a war, civil or otherwise, that they themselves started, they should just look to their role models through history for guidance. Lose the war, surrender, and maybe go out on their own terms in a bunker somewhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Republicans Started a Civil War They Don’t Know How to End

Anybody with a tiny knowledge of American history will know how to end it. Just look at how we ended the American Civil War, and then do the same to MAGA. Appeasing them doesn't work. Fight them directly. Eject them from the GOP and force them to start their own party. Find your own people to run against them in their districts and campaign hard. Get rid of MAGA like the plague it is.

I'm sure they're afraid that Democrats will take advantage of the situation and gain more power. During the American Civil War, France invaded Mexico because it had the opportunity while the US was distracted. But the US had no choice but to focus on our own issues. All that other stuff had to wait while we sorted our own shit out.

The same thing goes for the GOP. They'll have to work with the Democrats to get anything done at least until they can sort their shit out. This is one of those situations where the moral solution aligns very well with the practical solution.

[-] Jerkface@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean I get what you're saying, but this was their solution. They aligned themselves with these nutjobs precisely because they saw the demographic shift in the US and feared they would never win another election. There is no second-place, as far as they're concerned. This is what 'at-all-costs' looks like. It was this or political irrelevance. Changing their values meant losing their identity, which would be equivalant to death.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Eject them from the GOP

this would require republicans to grow a spine (not likely given their opposition to stem cell treatments) or have a sense of basic decency, love for their country, all things we know the GOP will not manage any time soon.

We should reanimate Lincoln and Teddy Roosevelt and just turn them loose on the caucus.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

If Lincoln was alive today, he'd be a Democrat.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

After he fucking strangled Trump. For sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 50 points 1 year ago

You know when magas have been promising another civil war, I didn’t predict it was going to be amongst themselves like this. But they did warn us it was coming.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, the only way for it to ever end was total fascist victory or total Republican destruction. There was no other endgame, and they had to know that. Which makes what they were hoping for obvious. Thankfully they were never going to win it fair and square, and their cheats aren't working for now. Hopefully this is the last gasp for the GOP.

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

So... If the GOP crumbles, do we get a new Left of Left I can vote for? You know, someone that actually wants to fund the elderly and healthcare and basic human rights, stop the war on drugs?

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

My "if I could wave a political magic wand" solution would be:

  1. The Republicans all but disappear. Maybe they would get 1% of the vote every election cycle, but nobody would take their candidate seriously. They'd get, at most, one piece per election cycle saying "looks like the Republicans are running a Nazi Klansman who wears his hood and waves around a Nazi flag at every event. And on actually important political news..."

  2. The Democratic party would split. One faction would be the Centrists. They would effectively be a "conservative" party in that they would be to the right. However, they would support LGBTQ+ rights, women's rights, etc. They might not support universal healthcare via Medicare For All, but they'd want as many people to have affordable health care and health insurance.

  3. The Progressives would split off from the Centrists. They would push for things like Medicare for All and other major policy changes.

  4. First Past The Post would get replaced with Ranked Choice or Approval Voting so that third parties could thrive. I prefer Ranked Choice, but Approval Voting is likely easier for the masses. In fact, they pretty much use it all the time on social media. "If you want to vote for Jack Johnson, click the 'like' button next to his name. If you want to vote for John Jackson, click the 'like' button next to HIS name."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 43 points 1 year ago

The moment they aired the clip of Gym telling the reporter, "The American people don't want us to work with the democrats" I laughed my motherfucking ass off. No, Gym. We want you to go away and some of you to go to jail for a long time because you broke your oath to the constitution and attempted to end it.

[-] makyo@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Someday, maybe, someday they'll learn that leading often includes making the tough decision. Which includes compromise and gasp dealing with Democrats!

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

You mean leadership isn't just shouting angrily into a mic?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rezifon@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

“My vote counted less than everyone else’s vote,” said Don Bacon, an anti-Jordan moderate from Nebraska. “In America, all of our votes count the same.”

This is an ironic complaint coming from the Senator from Nebraska (population 2,000,000). His constituents enjoy Senatorial votes that are ten times more impactful than a resident of New York (population 20,000,000)

[-] PizzaMan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

That, and generally republicans proudly support the electoral college, a system that intentionally weighs votes unequally, and destroys any chance of 3rd party candidates. So it is double ironic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] asg101@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

The 1st American Civil War never ended, it just went cold for a few decades. It started heating up again with Nixon's "Southern Strategy", and has just been getting hotter ever since.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Republicans, being hoisted: "wtf, that's MY petard!"

[-] icdmize@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Can't we just move on without them? They're bad for America anyways.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately no, not until we vote enough democrats in

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

He's not a "firebrand", he's a piece of shit

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

Republicans: Drain the Swamp... into Congress?

[-] June@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

Have we ever had a government shutdown during a general election?

With how clearly this lays at the feet of the gop, how bad will this make them suffer if the government isn’t open during the election? What happens to the election even?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] downpunxx@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Republicans have shut down Congress, this was their only goal, and they've been 100% successful in achieving it.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 16 points 1 year ago

epublicans

Are they generally rejecting their own “R” now as well?

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Hah, nice catch. Fixed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DrugsMcChrist@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

the only solution: fight to the death. let C-SPAN air it

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Sell it pay per view and watch the national debt go away!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
612 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4784 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS