this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
497 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

71352 readers
3701 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PirateFrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com 77 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

The worst thing about it is, even if you switch to Linux for privacy yourself, you'll also need your friends to switch as well, otherwise if you message them on their desktop, they're a liability, as the damn recall will be there too, leaking your data.

It'll be hell for activists.

[–] Blemgo@lemmy.world 50 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Funnily enough, Signal has circumvented the issue by marking their chat window as DRM content, making it invisible to Recall.

They used the invasion of privacy to destroy the invasion of privacy?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The same has been true of email for years, but less bad. Activists will need to be even more careful in who they trust.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 79 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Of course it is. It's invasive by design. The "recent tweaks" were because of backlash, but now that's died down

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 32 points 6 days ago (7 children)

I am surprised by how rabid the Recall backlash continues to be compared to similar features elsewhere. Apple's equivalent, in particular, seems to not be a concern to anybody. I don't have anything Apple, so I'm not sure if they ever rolled this out, but they sure announced it to a whole bunch of crickets.

[–] gray@pawb.social 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In fairness they’re not the same thing - recall records everything you do making a nice single honeypot of all your actions. Apple’s thing is really just a search bar that can reach into apps like email, calendar, etc - it’s not recording your bank logins. Google Play Services tracks everything you do on Android and sells it to advertisers.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 9 points 6 days ago (5 children)

It's a centralized search that can dig through your activity cross-platform and parses it through a centralized AI. Whether the data is stored in a log or as screenshots is a difference, but not as big of a difference as people make it out to be. It just feels intuitively weirder because one is humanly readable and the other one isn't.

To be fair, that's my takeaway from a lot of AI backlash. A whole bunch of it is people finally getting an intuitive grasp on activities that big data has been doing for years or decades and it finally clicking into shock because they can anthropomorphise the inputs and outputs better.

No wonder the techbros have lost their intuititon for what will trigger backlash. In many cases they've been doing far worse than those things with zero awareness or pushback.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago

Don't worry, Microsoft is bringing semantic search to Windows too. That way you can have the worst of both worlds.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Australis13@fedia.io 19 points 6 days ago

Interesting, I hadn't seen news about that Apple feature before... There seems to be a lot more press around Recall, which in turn amps up the amount of consumer attention and backlash.

That said (and I wouldn't want Apple's "semantic search" even if I had an Apple device), I'd still trust Apple more to manage the dataset securely compared to Microsoft. The Apple ecosystem is far more strictly controlled, whereas in Windows it's more of a free-for-all (most people just used XP as an administrator, the UAC could be easily disabled on Windows Vista and 7, etc.). Especially with Microsoft's move to put advertising in Windows 11 and complete lack of security measures in the initial version of Recall, it is very hard to trust Microsoft in this regard.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well:

  1. MacOS is not malware
  2. Apple doesn't make a habit of blatantly lying about their security
  3. As you said, it doesn't actually exist
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Ah, so Apple just happens to be one of the good massive megacorps routinely deploying anti-consumer practices. Gotcha.

See, it's that gap in perception I'm interested in. Microsoft wants nothing more than having the closed ecosystem Apple has. From their Surface line to their much maligned store to their subscription-forward, always signed-in account environment.

Why they suck so much at selling that where Apple can get away with murder is much more interesting to me than the perceived differences between the implementations, which I would argue in a number of cases are worked backwards from the brand perception anyway. Part of it is the implementation and the execution rakes Apple chooses not to step on, but certainly not all of it, and that's fascinating.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

so Apple just happens to be one of the good massive megacorps

No they're just a different type of shitty.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 4 days ago (3 children)

M$ is trying to take an open system and forcibly close it - after driving their user base by force into an unstable OS

Apple were smart enough to start locking their shit down before home computers became an absolute necessity ...and do it with a functional OS

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago (9 children)

that’s because “Apple Intelligence” is nearly 100% vaporware

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] stardust@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (11 children)

It is a stereotype but Apple diehards seem to go along with whatever Apple pushes, and people who don't like them don't use them anyways. Meanwhile Windows and Linux seems to have more people who are nitpicky about what they use, so group that tends to complain is going to be complaining more loudly about the OS they use would be my guess.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Nobody acturally expects privacy from Apple, if you use an Apple device they know Apple has all your information.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

on purpose. they announce something absurd, so people get mad, and they step down to something they wanted anyway (and even pass the impression they are listening to their users opinions)

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 47 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Um, the core feature is privacy invasion. It does what it says on the tin.

It's fine if some people want that functionality, as long as it's not enabled by default.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

One could argue that it's a feature that could be done on-client without sending to a server. Or with its server component doing nothing more than syncing with E2E encryption.

[–] russjr08@bitforged.space 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I have zero interest in Recall, but I thought it was already done on-device? IIRC it always was that way, which is why it's only available on new computers containing dedicated "neural coprocessors" I believe was the term.

Now given that it's closed source, you have to trust that they aren't silently sending data back to themselves - which is where my problem lies, I don't trust them in the slightest.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Angular2575@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What I don't understand, is what I would need and use it for? Never in my life I thought "damn if only I had a screen recording of everything I did 1 week, 1 month or 1 year ago". Like I don't get the use case, ignoring anything else. There is no use case.

I can view my terminal history and my recently accessed files. I have version control with git where I want and need it.

There is no use case.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So you’ve never wanted to find an article/headline that you vaguely remember seeing? Or a product that you looked at? Or a picture that you looked at?

There absolutely is a use case for full reachability of everything you’ve done on your computer. Git commits and terminal history and “recent” files list don’t even come close to providing the same thing lol

[–] Ydna@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

It's true that there's some usefulness in recollection, but geez I find myself digging through my browser history and being absolutely lost... whether it's an article, video, online store product, anything. Then I usually just re-search for whatever it was from scratch 🤷‍♂️

[–] illorenz@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Another great reason to switch to Linux. Fuck this shit

[–] plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago

Yes.

Worth it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Draegur@lemmy.zip 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (6 children)

Part of why i knew so-called "digital rights management" was fucking bullshit was because very little software ever came out that empowered me to manage MY OWN rights in the digital space.

I need there to be FOSS applications that allow me to root-level BLOCK applications from perceiving what I'm doing, to just fucking SANDBOX ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING BY DEFAULT and let me whitelist what specific things are allowed to directly access the hardware.

Sadly I am not as tech savvy as I used to think I was. I might've been technologically clever twenty years ago but I hadn't managed to keep up... I think what I've described might be referred to as a "hypervisor"? And I'm told it's an overbearing, clumsy, heavy-handed overkill measure that would be difficult to implement and make everything a pain in the ass to do. So ... shit, man, I dunno... i'm just so damn tired of my hardware being bossed around by people I didn't authorize.

[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Maybe it's time you invested some time in finding alternatives that let you stay in control of said hardware. I know time is in short supply for all of us, so consider your priorities.

[–] xep@fedia.io 7 points 6 days ago

I prefer the term Digital Restrictions Management.

[–] RobotZap10000@feddit.nl 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Programs ran through Flatpak can only access permissions and directories that it has explicit permission for. This is perfect for a very small program that only does one thing, it can get rather awkward when you need it to access multiple storage volumes. For example, I wanted to have my Steam games stored on different hard drives, but they were never visible through Steam. I had to override the Flatpak permission to give access to my mounted disks for it to work.

[–] Draegur@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 days ago

The fact that we can choose to enhance the permissions beyond their default scope on a case by case basis is powerful.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I've disabled windows update completely so I can pick and manually dl updates. Never going to put that recall shit on my pc.

[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I've disabled Windows completely so I can be safe and sound. Never going to put that shit on my PC.

-- sorry, it seemed funnier in my head.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

How'd you do that? I've made registry tweaks, group policy tweaks, etc and my windows machine still eventually hits a limit where it forces updates around the 12 week mark. Granted it's still longer than before, it isn't completely disabled.

[–] Spaniard@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At that point it's easier to install Linux.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago

I run Linux too, but I have to use windows for some contract jobs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This is just a thinly veiled ad for AdGuard.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

OK, so... where the hell is Recall?

I have a Copilot + device. I am typing this in one, in fact. Recall does not seem to be anywhere to be seen. They added a deployable Google Lens-style "highlight a thing for us to review" thing. It was so intrusive and easy to deploy by accident I got a pretty good notification that I should go turn it off. Maybe that was part of the Recall rollout?

Incidentally, this piece is... a bit weird. Not only is it an ad, but the concerns they seem to flag as still existing (presumably to sell you their security subscription) seem to be that there is no biometric unlock and just the system PIN and that they don't trust Microsoft on principle. The second is up to you, but the first doesn't really work for me. Not only is the PIN a valid override to biometrics across the board in general (Windows defaults to that when biometrics fails), but it's more secure on principle, since it can't be entered by accident or by force.

I just don't think the featue is particularly useful for how much potential it has for accidental misuse (even if they never see the data and they keep it entirely secure). It's not the only one of this class, or even Microsoft's first attempt at this (a similar feature shipped with Windows 8). It's certainly become more of a meme than anything else at this point.

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 2 points 5 days ago

Yeh the entire article is just an ad for AdGuard, using FUD to sell their product.

load more comments
view more: next ›