this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
373 points (99.5% liked)

196

3511 readers
1933 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Djehngo@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Makes sense, the more immigration is seen to be a problem the better republicans do on voting day.

They want to talk about how high immigration is but so little to tackle it, Dems are incentivised to do the opposite.

Super apparent in the UK where the conservatives government decided to spend enormous sums sending a handful of asylum seekers to Rwanda rather than actually paying people to process their claims.

[–] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 21 hours ago

The same happened in Germany. Right wing radicals and extremists wanted more deportation of migrants and liberals pointed out how the former government (greens, socdems and neoliberals) did a "good job" and deported way more people than the conservative government before them.

That’s not a flex, that is sad, that a supposedly more progressive government goes against minorities even harder than the conservatives

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 89 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This shouldn't be a flex... It's just a reminder why I didn't understand the deep love for Obama for being a good orator who happened to codify the worst excesses of the Bush administration and basically laid the groundwork for someone like Trump to abuse the mass surveillance state Bush built and Obama expanded.

[–] Vedlt@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Obviously I can't know the intention behind the tweet, but I took it more as an attack on his fragile ego than a flex. Here's hoping anyway.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 19 points 1 day ago

Yes this is obviously the point. We don't have to be in favor of Obama deportations to acknowledge that they weren't illegal and possibly not human rights abuses

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Stripping us of what the creator gave us at birth is bipartisan

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 day ago (3 children)

all im getting from this is that democrats are more efficient and discreet fascists than republicans

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

Is it still fascism if they get due process?

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

Yeah... Commie Obamacare

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 23 hours ago

You can also get that protest and resistance works. They are seeing less success in deportations because of the work of americans making it much harder.

Oh well he did it efficiently, that makes it so much better. You would think the Democrats would be able to put 1% as much effort into winning as they do violating human rights and engaging in war crimes but apparently not.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 19 points 1 day ago

Hey I don't want the government to be better at that.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Things that make me want to unalive myself

[–] toodd@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 hours ago

we don’t have to please the algorithmic censorship gods here 😉