this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
290 points (96.5% liked)

Comic Strips

17389 readers
2637 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] steal_your_face@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)
[–] reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No they didn't. Bones would be on the outside as they are the innermost body part.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

exoskeleton with a thin layer of marrow on top?

[–] reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I could see such an abomination fitting right in with the aesthetics of Scorn.

[–] reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 days ago

Oh! If you like Scorn, look up Necrophosis. It's a masterpiece.

[–] smoker@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Is that really it though? Humans are topologically the same as a straw, so it would be more akin to maybe turning a sock inside out, or pulling your head through your digestive tract and out your ass.

It’d probably end up with your entire body enclosed in a big pink roundish sack, the outside being the mucous membranes that were previously the lumen of the digestive tract. It would probably break every bone in your body.

I suppose it depends on your definition of “innermost”. If we’re talking the deepest relative to skin, then it would be as above. If we’re saying “farthest from where atmosphere can reach without puncturing anything”, then yeah I guess it would be the skeleton. The anatomical definition is definitely the former, though.

[–] reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 days ago

I mean, I get where you're coming from. But if you're looking at this from a topological standpoint, I can only point you towards the Vsauce video:

https://youtu.be/egEraZP9yXQ

In which case we're well within the realm of assumptions, because it really depends on perspective how many holes we have.

I prefer the bone interpretation, at least for limbs, because inside out doesn't necessarily imply the "action of turning inside out" is necessary. So we can just have the straw swap inner and outer positions. That's how I'd see it, meaning... Bone.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Inside-Out Boy 1989

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Muscle groups inside a distorted skeleton, with organs on the outside. The trickiest or most confusing things would be the boney sockets on the skull would bulge out (shielding the eye balls which would be completely encased by them)... Also the septum of the nose would be on the outside of the nose area of the skull... I guess the brain would be like a hat?

Nah you over think it. All that needs to be accomplished is for what's inside to become outside. A laxative would count under this very literal interpretation.