this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
113 points (97.5% liked)

Fediverse

34448 readers
2442 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It seems like it should be sort of a priority for the fediverse to create a high quality alternative to Facebook, which is one of the largest platforms out there, and probably what a lot of people think of when they think of "social media", and yet, the marketing and overall adoption of Friendica is simply abysmal, to put it bluntly.

Issue 1: The super bland and basic on-boarding.

When you visit the main website for friendica, you are greeted with "friendica: a decentralized social media network" followed by a "try it" button. Then when you scroll down, there is basic black text on a white background, explaining things like decentralization, privacy, and interoperability. Do you think that this sort of intro is really going to draw people in? It gives off the vibe of "it is your birthday", a la dwight from the office.

If you click on the "try it" button, you get scrolled to a part of the site that says "Try Friendica" with two sentences that basically say "this website is really complex overall, but don't worry, you can click another button below to browse a list of servers (yes, servers, we are not explaining what that means, just click the button)". The actual server list has a single filter option, language, and if you filter by english, the top server right now is a furry server. If any normie has somehow managed to get this far, they are sure to nope the fuck out at this point.

Assuming you do manage to get past this point, the actual sign up form has way too much information for the average person. The first field is "openID". I'm sure that's useful for those who use it, but why is it the first field? There is also a check box to be added to the public directory, which is checked no by default. What does this mean? It is certainly not explained here. You're not asking for a password? Why not? Oh, because you are making a random password for me I have to copy and paste and then save or change. That's not inconvenient at all. Yet another step of friction for me.

Compare this on-boarding process to other sites on the fediverse. Mastodon has a catchy and succinct explainer on why their site is worth joining followed by a "join mastodon.social" button, or a "pick another server" button. If you go to the servers button, you get several different filtering options, region, interest, sign up process, legal structure, and very notably, a disclaimer that all of these servers have signed a safety agreement. Upon signing up, you first agree to some terms of service, which is very reassuring for those looking for a safe and welcoming platform, followed by entering username, e-mail, password and date of birth. All very straight forward. Lemmy is similarly streamlined and polished, and you don't even need an e-mail to sign up for some servers. Super easy and convenient.

Issue 2: Terrible mascot.

Mastodon has their mastodon carrying a knapsack. Lemmy has the lemming face. Pixelfed has a cute red panda. Friendica has.....some kind of demented looking rabbit with bugged out eyes? Seriously, what the hell is this?

Issue 3: Super basic blog style website.

As alluded to in issue 1, the website is super basic, with almost no polish to it. It looks like someone made it on wordpress. The home page does have some clip art type images and background stuff thrown in here and there, but outside of that, it looks very unprofessional. Again, comparing to sites like Mastodon and Lemmy, which have much more polished and professional looking web design. The clearly put time into making sure new users get a good impression. Friendica puts almost no effort whatsoever.

So these three issues, just from an outsiders glance, are in my opinion some of the biggest things holding back what could potentially be one of the most used sites on the fediverse, at least on the marketing side of things. I do not know how the overall team behind the site is structured, but suffice to say, it needs work.

(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] viral.vegabond@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I tend to agree. I think that even though it might seem a little harsh, it's also pretty important to be brutally honest and realistic about things like this. Maybe consider sending this feedback to the developers (in a constructive way, of course).

edit:
I wanted to add that I think the name 'Friendica' is a really good one, and I like what they have going on. I have heard good things about it in general, despite the dated design/style elements.

[–] korendian@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Totally, the name and overall functionality is decent, and I actually do enjoy using it once I figure out how. It just needs a bit of a face lift and overall marketing rework.

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The mascot argument seem like cherry picking. I completly agree about the two other points

[–] korendian@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's part of an overall image. I know it seems minor, but when the sign up is janky, the website is janky, then you somehow get a janky error with some bizarre looking rabbit, it just adds to the pile of things that might make people think it's amateur hour.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I couldn't find the rabbit on Friendica's website, but I did find it here: https://joinfediverse.wiki/Fediverse_mascots#Flaxy_O%E2%80%99Hare

You're right, it's awful lol.

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

That's actually pretty funny. :)

[–] bayleaf@piefed.ca 4 points 3 days ago

I don't know. I think it's actually kind of cute. I like it.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I stopped using facebook years before fediverse even existed.

I think the facebook public is not the same as the fediverse public.

The most developed fediverse apps are the ones that clone sites that the geeks used to roam, like twitter and reddit.

When people develope something like this, usually is because themselves want to use it. I would assume that, like me, not many people want to use a facebook-like site.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Jerry@feddit.online 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 1 points 3 days ago (15 children)

Guys, it's time to accept the Fediverse apps and websites are not meant to and never will be a replacement for mainstream social media. They are meant for a hobbyist and activist audience.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 3 days ago

Let's stop with the slacktivism and start putting money on the table, and professionals of all specialties will show up and change this reality.

[–] korendian@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That is pretty depressing then. I always viewed the fediverse and activitypub as a transformative technology that could reshape the state of corporate control of the internet. What you are saying that that will never happen and we should just basically give up.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

The SteamDeck uses Linux. It took 20 years, but it's still something.

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They are trailblazers for sure, but I don't think they should be made into full blown mega corpoi, that is not the philosophy of open source apps.

[–] korendian@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Where have I said that I want them to turn into a full mega corp? All I am hoping for is enough success to be useful for people. Like Mastodon and Lemmy are already. Like blue sky is.

[–] dehyzer@piefed.social -3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I honestly consider that to be a feature, not a bug.

Reddit, Facebook, Twitter etc. all started out great, then grew so large that they lost all their magic.

Why should we try to speed run that process with the Fediverse?

[–] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 2 points 3 days ago

That's part of my point, yes!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee -1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's open source. Feel free to contribute.

[–] korendian@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I am not a programmer or web developer. This post is meant as a contribution to those that are capable. If there is some user feedback forum more appropriate, I would be happy to contribute there. I apologize for not being able to contribute more. I will work on my programming skills and see if I am able to help in a more concrete way.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›