science

19381 readers

27 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

laverabe@lemmy.zip

122

Cancers can be detected in bloodstream three years prior to diagnosis (hub.jhu.edu)

submitted 2 days ago by daniel_callahan@jlai.lu to c/science@lemmy.world

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] liverbe@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Already available but of course not covered by insurance... and expensive ~$1K.

https://www.galleri.com/what-is-galleri

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the medical world, $1k is almost free.

[–] liverbe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

And only $750 with the coupon code. 🤣

I imagine it seems worth it if you test positive for cancer and not worth it if it comes back negative.

I imagine most people won't pay $1K for a test they don't necessarily "need".

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In the US?

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Cancers can be diagnosed three years before they can be diagnosed" wow thank you wanna maybe write a headline that actually means something?

[–] DempstersBox@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

It's not a diagnosis, it's detecting metabolites produced by cancerous cells.

A diagnosis is determining exactly what cancer it is, and how bad it is.

Early detection like this is fucking awesome though. If it works and becomes available, I'll be getting a regular screening. Lord only knows how many carcinogenic substances I've been exposed to

[–] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

Minority Report? Someusomething theranos?