this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
95 points (83.7% liked)

Science Memes

15221 readers
1538 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] protist@mander.xyz 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How soon before someone is citing this article as evidence? 😩

[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] protist@mander.xyz 13 points 1 day ago
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I first went about the humane capture of the wildlife of C-100. A few peacocks were caught with bear traps, an iguana was captured via a falling piano, and a peacock bass was shot in the face with a shotgun, all in line with the standards set by the Florida Constitution [3].

Truly gold.

Edit: Didn't realize this was Immaterial Science - my favorite is the FUPLC-NMR-CE6-GC-IR-ICP-MS-MS-MS-MS (pdf warning)

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This evidence is certainly in contrast to those who believe, based on the writings of Charles Dickens alone, that the Earth is around 4.5 billion years old.

🀣 this writer is genius

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

So this is obviously satire but reading this it just sounded way too close to current reality for comfort.

I know that parts of the document are acme levels over the top but other parts sincerely read as if written by your average Maga idiot

[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

At first I thought it was satire, but when I saw the writer had the scientific PokΓ©dex entries I knew it was legit

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I was tired of being a Darwinist. Now I follow the writings of Dickens; I'm a Dickhead.

[–] exixx@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We’re expected to believe that the peacocks personally recounted their lineage? In English? I feel like the author is just making things up at that point.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Well after these peacocks were crushed by a piano, they might have been unable to recount anything at all.

I dunno, but I feel like the author might have taken some creative liberties here...

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago
[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You got me. This one is too good.

[–] 667@lemmy.radio 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The first tell was the author using the first person, and the next tell was the piano falling.

[–] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

2 Miami-Dade College, Kendall, FL, USA Department of Fictional Geology

Thankful I saw that first, very relieved.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I only read the abstract. So I missed the piano falling part entirely.

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There are pokΓ©dex entry # for fossils!

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

That is exactly what clued me in.

You missed the pokedex entries too!

[–] waz@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

β€œI first went about the humane capture of the wildlife of C-100. A few peacocks were caught with bear traps, an iguana was captured via a falling piano,Β  and a peacock bass was shot in the face with a shotgun, all in line with the standards set by the Florida Constitution [3].”

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 day ago

My fave part was the expired crispr kits, arbitrarily cut off at desired date.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The inclusion of PokΓ©dex Entry numbers is great.
Also, I like the sources cited for the paper. One of them is "Pigeon-Elephant Theory: the real origin of humans – Journal of Astrological Big Data Ecology by B McGraw"

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is there money in writing crap "research" papers like this?

I would be fine doing this under a pseudonym. But I know UFO researchers really have to hustle a ton. So maybe not?

[–] notthebees@reddthat.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

People also do this to take the piss out of a junk journal. Usually ones that let anything through

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Ooooohhhh... That's a thing? Let me guess, I have to pay to publish my ChatGPT-authored "research" proving that cats are actually aliens?

[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I have no idea, but I am guessing the religious right pays handsomely for anything "scientific" which supports their absolutely asinine beliefs.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Clicked thinking it was legit. Good find OP!

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 day ago

Only a few bites because people, understandably, aren't biting that headline.

Share a screenshot of the article instead and they'll be all over it.