this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
626 points (98.8% liked)

politics

24190 readers
3187 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump was unhappy with his sparsely attended military parade over the weekend and blamed it on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, biographer Michael Wolff revealed.

Wolff told The Daily Beast Podcast that Trump wanted a “menacing” show of force to celebrate the Army’s 250th anniversary and his 79th birthday on Saturday—but got a “festive” parade instead.

“He’s p---ed off at the soldiers,” Wolff said. “He’s accusing them of hamming it up, and by that, he seems to mean that they were having a good time, that they were waving, that they were enjoying themselves and showing a convivial face rather than a military face.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 22 points 8 hours ago

Hegseth, you royally fucked it up. Leaking classified military in a Signal group chat? Excusable. A White Supremacist? Excusable. Drunken paranoia? Excusable. HOW DARE YOU FUCK UP THE PARADE!? Pack your shit up and go back to Fox News.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

He’s trying to be a dictator damn it! Why won’t anyone take him seriously? Waaaaah

[–] AoxoMoxoA@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Because he's a lollipop head, bitch and nobody is scared of him

[–] ShittDickk@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago

So their only job is to walk in a straight line, and they pick Alchohegseth to train them? Never could have seen this coming.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 38 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Goose stepping is actually incredibly difficult and has no military value

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

Hmmm, maybe negative military value. After all not too many forces are winners with kicks above a set level.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 41 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

This is what you get when your hiring criteria is who is the best ass kisser.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 16 points 12 hours ago

DEI. Dumb (and) extra idiotic.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 46 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

HAHAHAHAHA what a fucking toddler. Did they not have enough plain cheese pizza with ketchup for your bday party, you pathetic attention-hungry piece of shit

[–] tektite@slrpnk.net 25 points 12 hours ago

He didn't want PIZZA! He wanted FRENCH FRIES from MCDONALDS!!! He wanted RONALD to personally cut his burger up for him because it's EMBARRASSING when his MOM does it! He wanted to use the SLIDE but he POOPED on it before he made it to the bottom and that's SOMEONE ELSE'S fault!!!

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

So, now we know what was really bothering the Orange POS during the G7 meeting. LOL! The mofo dozed off during the waste of time and money.

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 64 points 14 hours ago

"we aren't kings"

Cries when parade isn't dictator-y enough.

[–] b3an@lemmy.world 36 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I think he somehow associates their behavior with a lack of discipline. He expected coordinated … 🪿 stepping and unwavering devotion to their CiC who has zero respect for them or something? I can’t wrap my head around whatever circles of logic he tries to use

[–] Azal@pawb.social 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I'm going to say I 100% agree with you. The lunatic wants North Korean style marches and is angry that's not happening.

But I also want to say, what clips I've seen holy crap their marching was abysmal, like I've seen Civil Air Patrol flights with better marching. I'm not military so I can only talk so much, when listening to vets, their comments are along the lines of the people in the parade basically doing a shitty job because "Mandatory Fun Day" as apparently it's called.

Frankly I think that's funny myself.

[–] Demonmariner@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Their marching was poor because there is almost no practical reason why anyone in today's Army should ever need to march. The vast majority of service people do very little marching after basic training.

[–] bieren@lemmy.zip 29 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

And this is why he will get the us involved in Iran. He needs something to boost his ego after this amazing by failure.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Half of it is still about oil. Saudi Arabia has mass amounts of oil and fewer people. Iran has more people and a decent (but less) amount of oil. For years Iran has been trying to sell off their oil at cheaper prices in mass to force money into their economy. Some may argue it's to raise the quality of living for the people, others may argue it's because they believe the oil will do them no good 100 years from now so selling it all off and raking in what money they can now will only help them. Saudi Arabia has money, just doesn't distribute it evenly, and their profit margins would be hurt by prices being driven down. Other countries like the U.S. also would struggle to complete in selling oil at lower prices as our lifting costs are higher. So oil companies selling out of the US and around the world benefit greatly from Iran not selling off their oil at lower costs. (It's less than 1/2 to 1/3 the cost for Iran the lift the oil). So the U.S. stays friends with Saudi Arabia and tries to stop other countries from lowering their prices.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What is this a graph of? What do the different colours mean? What is the UK top in the world of? My maths teacher drilled into us that a bar chart has to have a title and a key and units. This graph has none of them!

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

https://www.statista.com/statistics/597669/cost-breakdown-of-producing-one-barrel-of-oil-in-the-worlds-leading-oil-producing-countries/

The lifting costs by country (US dollar/barrel). The UK has the highest lifting costs, therefore must sell oil at the lowest profit margins if they sell at a global price match. The lower the lifting costs, the higher margin for profit.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Nah made sense to ask, I cropped it like shit so it didn't have other phone screen on it, should have done better.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Basic premise though was crude oil sells at $75 per barrell, the US averaged 4.5 million Barrells a day in 2024 (exports). If the cost per barrel dropped to $65 a barrell that's a $16.5 billion dollars lost per year. That's 66x the amount of money Elon spent to assist Trump in winning the election.

So it makes sense to pay millions or a few hundred million from oil executives to ensure oil prices stay where they are.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 12 points 13 hours ago

The Republican tradition of killing brown kids to keep rich old men wealthy

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 77 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Dictators always blame others for their failings.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 41 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

But hegseth is a failure too.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 7 points 12 hours ago

He isn't top shelf, but his liquor is...

[–] caboose2006@lemm.ee 28 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Take it easy in the admins token DUI hire

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

I don’t think he has many tokens — at least not from AA.

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 24 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder what Kim Jong Un’s reaction was when he saw the photos of Trumps dinky little parade

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 186 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

This Presidential outburst is brought to you by:

Coinbase

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Weirdfish@lemmy.world 232 points 21 hours ago (15 children)

He's not happy they smiled and waved at the people they signed away their lives to protect.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 131 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This is how Trump treats the US Army soldiers who were forced to march in front of Trump for a day that was supposed to celebrate them and their accomplishments.

Thank you to the US Army for trying to pit something together that would be fun for US citizens. If it weren't for Trump smearing his shit all over everything I'm sure plenty more would have turned out to show their support as real Americans celebrating real patriots rather than the fascists so many US soldiers have died fighting against.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 95 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

Didn't see much of it but the uniforms and equipment from every era was hella cool. They actually made it about army history, not a goose-stepping show of force.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

Drumpf isn't a fan of history, or learning.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 30 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Frankly, it’s just about the best way the Army could have handled this whole thing.

Always remember: the vast majority of the US Army is very, very good at malicious compliance. I’m pretty sure the E4 mafia grants you an unofficial Malicious Compliance MOS once you make that rank.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

There are two types of people who survive decently in the military. Those who can find every loophole and can maliciously comply, and those who allow themselves to be completely broken and reshaped into perfect compliance by the system.

Many people believe the second group is more common, but it’s really not, since those people tend to be in lower ranking positions. Bullet catchers and the like.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 points 13 hours ago

I bet the parade could have been well executed and vibrant. My guess is that the organizer deliberately botched things when they got word about Dinky Donnie wanting to be the centerpiece. Donald really shouldn't be an 'Era', not the kind to be proud of, at any rate.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 61 points 19 hours ago

This is precisely why Trump is so angry

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 54 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

that they were enjoying themselves and showing a convivial face rather than a military face.

If he didn't want soldiers that were excited to be there, then why did he have them screened for political association to make sure they were his supporters?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 5 points 12 hours ago

God early Cartman...

load more comments
view more: next ›