this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2025
782 points (95.6% liked)

Science Memes

15263 readers
2169 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 5 points 12 hours ago

You should see the schnozes they're sticking on hadrosaurs these days.

https://earthsky.org/earth/juvenile-hadrosaur-fossil-reveals-fleshy-snout/

[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 62 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So tired of this meme, especially in a science themed sub. It's just wrong and thusly promotes disinformation because it takes seconds to read a meme like this and move on without question. Meanwhile it takes (comparitavely) ages to actually research how fossils are reconstructed. If people even think to research it in the first place, because, hey, it's in a science-based sub, right??

Remember kids, the best memes are those based on truth 😎

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 31 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

ok, but can we make fun of old "skin wrapping" reconstructions?

because for most people, Jurassic park are still their standard version of dinosaur reconstitution.

[–] iheartneopets@lemm.ee 13 points 23 hours ago

Right, and that's why most people would believe this meme and take it as 100% truthful. The meme doesn't specify that that's the way we USED to do it, it says that's how it would be done

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

so, what is the other reconstitution?

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

feathers, more chonky, appropriate colours...

not just reptile dragon monsters

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 8 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Feathers and colours? Dinosaurs must have looked absolutely FABULOUS!

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 15 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

you say it as a joke, but look at the non extinct dinosaurs we have today,

most birds are indeed much more flamboyant than Jurassic park dinosaurs

[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

Something that stands out to me is how the most colorful creatures are good at evasion. Birds and bugs flying or reef creatures have hiding holes. Other colorful life tends to be toxic.

For this reason I doubt the huge species had color that stood out from their environment.

[–] Lazhward@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Prehistoric Planet, I say as an amateur. But from what little I read about it it's pretty alright apparently, and most of the 'wrong/we're not sure about this bit' things are listed on the wiki afaik.

Of course there's much more scientific depth possible than a TV show, but it's a start towards recreating the common notion of what dinosaurs may have looked like.

[–] profgrumpypants@midwest.social 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I was wondering this very thing. As some fossils were preserved whole, as others were not. I believe though, the whole ones, or even the ones that captured large contiguous chunks of tail could disprove this. Not sure, just was having a guess.

*Not due to soft tissue being found but more so signs of trapped decay of some sort.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] x3x3@lemm.ee 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

We sometimes have dinosaur fossil records with feathers. So yeah we already know all the Jurassic park movies are wrong but since we gotten used to them we keep the wrong reconstructions

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Fossils are more than just bone in many cases, and study of bones can reveal what they were. Example is that T. rex had lips. How would they know that? By looking at the teeth and how they wear down compared to other animals like alligators, etc.

[–] firipu@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can also see where the lip muscles attach to the jaw.

The memes that our current Dino images are wrong are very outdated. Our images are probably surprisingly close to reality.

[–] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Why don’t you want us to have weird dinosaurs?

[–] xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works 3 points 21 hours ago

We already have them, just follow any paleoartist that microblogs.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 5 points 21 hours ago

Example is that T. rex had lips.

[–] drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone 123 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

There are actually some fossils of dinosaur mummies, a rare preservation of a rare preservation. For some species these give us direct evidence of their physical appearance beyond their bone structure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinosaur_mummy

[–] Pilon23@feddit.dk 16 points 23 hours ago

dinosaur mummies

6 year old me would've been scared shitless with this information

Imagine Brendan Fraser fighting some of these fuckers, fuck the third Mummy movie set in China give me Brendan Fraser getting his ass kicked in North Dakota because he unearthed some dinosaur mummy at Hell Creek.

[–] jonsnothere@beehaw.org 36 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is actually doing a disservice to all the work paleontologists do in reconstructing. There was indeed a time where there was too much stretching over bones, but this is something they are now very aware of. Also keep in mind reptiles, avians and and mammals have a very different relationship between bones and body. It's mainly mammals that tend to add a lot of bulk like that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I still think T-rex was a big chonky birb.

[–] Gumus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Bro did you take half an hour just to draw that shit?

Edit: I love the drawing chill out you fuckers

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Dont worry about that, it only took as long as you took writing that comment.

[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I fucking love the drawing bro

[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's not new. Been around for a long time. I always comment that to draw it out of someone's meme stash. πŸ™‚

[–] FuckFascism@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Clever girl

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 6 points 23 hours ago

he can't be too chunky due to gigantothermia, though he was probably as chunky as an elephant.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just looking at the skeleton, we would reconstruct a lot of thing wrong.

Camel:

Platypus:

Seal:

Elephant:

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This was already done in "All Todays," which features depictions of modern animals as distant-future paleontologists might reconstruct them, given just skeletal remains.

Example of Elephant, Zebra, and Rhino:

'All Todays' Explained - https://obscuredinosaurfacts.com/blog/post/2020/09/16/all-todays.html

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 1 points 9 hours ago

Thank you for sharing this. It's interesting.

This seems like a fun way to create new creatures. Take existing skeletons and just try to plop on flesh in unique ways.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 2 points 19 hours ago
[–] Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Where else would I see a roentgen of a beaver tail?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί