this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

Military

0 readers
10 users here now

Red Army Forever

for posting on military topics

For Military Theory

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the author overstates the case for China/Russia getting involved and understates how much damage a 2-week sustained air campaign can do to Iranian civilian infrastructure.

I also think the author understates the cost to the US of a 2-week sustained air campaign considering their severely limited stocks.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 week ago

I generally agree, the logistics are very much against the US here.

[–] PanArab@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The US couldn't defeat Afghanistan and Afghanistan is a significantly poorer and less populous country. The US though can still weaken or ruin Iran for years to come. Iraq is a shell of its former self more than a decade after the US invasion.

I want to be optimistic but the US is dangerous and no one will hold it accountable if it decided to use nuclear weapons.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 week ago

The use of nukes is what worries me the most.