this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
23 points (60.2% liked)

Showerthoughts

36017 readers
545 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

No, there isn't. At all. What so ever. A soldier is merely a tool by a state that may or may not (and historically NOT) have good intentions.

A soldier is first and foremost instructed to FOLLOW ORDERS. Not because of some nefarious plot to use people, but because doubt on the battlefield can mean a weakness ripe for exploitation, and can introduce delays that mean defeat.

A soldier is a TOOL, not a freedom fighter.

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Naw man as a soldier you will be told to do your tiny part of a tiny task. No kidding that part may just be, take that water tank over there and wait until told what to do.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago

This post screams of insecurity and sadness on the part of OP.

I think OP romanticizes the idea of being a soldier like a Hollywood actor.

OP has never served.

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

On a scale of 1-10 how high are you right now?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 4 days ago

That not how any of that works.

[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 12 points 4 days ago (5 children)

There has never been a time where soldiers were fighting for freedom. They fight for their master.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's a very cynical view. Their country is their master, if they got invaded, like Ukraine do, then them fighting for their master(or country, if you will) is fighting for freedom.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev -2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Fighting foreign enemies at home doesn't automatically make it a "fight for freedom". Case in point: Taliban vs USA

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago

Fighting foreign enemies at home doesn't automatically make it a "fight for freedom".

Uhh no shit, nuance is important.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You don't think the Taliban were fighting for their freedom?

What were they fighting for then?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

Fighting for power first and foremost, but I guess you could go and say it was for the "freedom to rule"

I mean, there are soldiers fighting for their countries' safety today! They're just not the ones thousands of kilometres away from home (they might be piloting drones on the other side of the world, I guess, lol), of course.

[–] scintilla@kbin.earth 2 points 4 days ago

What do you consider a soldier to be? Because I have a feeling you are using a very narrow definition that excludes some of the examples I would make.

[–] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Maybe not in our lifetime, but you're really going to say ww2 wasn't to stop evil? What about the civil war?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

ww2 wasn’t to stop evil?

It wasn't, thinking so is a very absurd reduction of many different interests at play over 3 fronts (Africa, Europe, Asia)

What about the civil war?

Which one? Afghan, Lybian, Syrian, Iraqi, Rwandan, Spanish?

This guy is defending nazis and slavery

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

When you're a soldier you don't really have agency over the morality of what you do, aside from being technically allowed to protest against committing war crimes.

So no.

You just generally hope the government of the military you're serving is makes the moral call.

What you're thinking of is a violent psychotic vigilante.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago
[–] bitcrafter@programming.dev 5 points 4 days ago

+1 actually a shower thought

If you're one of those brave dudes trying to hit aircraft with old rocket launchers while sprinting in your flipflops, you're almost certainly putting down evil, sure.