this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
206 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24800 readers
2309 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 90 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man commits about a hundred heinous crimes and becomes leader of a country

Hundreds of people who have committed no crimes or minor crimes get sent to a concentration camp where they're probably going to die from diseases or hurricanes

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 1 day ago

No war but class war.

And the most important part if that is that it isn't an ideal - it's a fact. All war is class war and the ruling class is already fighting it, and has been fighting it for decades. And they're winning by forfeit.

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Gerrymandering is nothing new.

What will set Trump apart is that I'm pretty sure he'll deploy his ICE private paramilitary in blue states to discourage the "wrong" people from going out to vote, or deploy the military over some made-up emergency or other to cancel the elections altogether.

Why do you think ICE just got $45bn? Yes, that's BILLIONS. Hell of a budget increase for a mere immigration enforcement agency isn't it?

What do you think the LA rehearsal was for?

There won't be fair mid-term elections. Mark my words.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

And I'm sure while the average dipshit normie qon believes that voting by mail has some kind of security flaws, you can be sure the elites don't believe that.

They don't want people being able to safely vote from home.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago

Speaking of, there were bomb threats during the 2024 elections that I'm sure tipped the balance as well.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

Shit should cause a riot tbh

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Any Dem governor not doing the same needs voted out

We dont have time for politicians who think we still have time to hold back.

[–] FundMECFS@quokk.au 5 points 1 day ago

In the wake of The New York Times’ report last month on the Trump administration’s redistricting efforts in Texas, more details have emerged about the attempt to pressure the state’s leaders into a potentially unlawful — and certainly illiberal — mid-decade redraw of its congressional districts in order to shore up the GOP’s chances in next year’s midterms. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has instructed his state’s Republican-led legislature to craft a redistricting plan this summer, in a move my MSNBC colleague Hayes Brown aptly assessed as a mockery of the Voting Rights Act.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wow. Sure seems like this right here should justify some preemptive measures, right? Right?? RIGHT???

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lawmakers tried to pass election reform/protections during Biden's term, and they were systematically blocked by Republicans.

The lack of alarm and campaigning around that was exasperating. The Democratic party knew elections would be rigged and still chose to act like things were basically normal.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lawmakers tried to pass election reform/protections during Biden’s term, and they were systematically blocked by Republicans.

Which, honestly makes me question the validity of the 2024 election.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Correct. I mean every single swing state? One county in NY with ZERO Kamala votes? Something like 12% bullet ballots in blue counties only when the avg is 1%? Voting machines connected to Starlink?

Stolen election. It's not just bullshit like 2020. This shit was taken by the billionaire class.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

Blue MAGA nonsense.

I mean every single swing state? Why would it be surprising for all the swing states to swing in one direction? They don't swing randomly, they usually swing together.

One county in NY with ZERO Kamala votes?

Precinct, not a county. A precinct dominated by an orthodox Jewish community that all vote together. The congregation decided to vote for Trump.

Something like 12% bullet ballots in blue counties only when the avg is 1%?

Trump drives out low-propensity voters, and he's way more popular than Congressional Republicans generally.

Voting machines connected to Starlink?

Voting machines aren't connected to the internet.

Don't be like Republicans. You're better than this.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Isn't there some kind of law against election interference? Isn't there something that can be done about blatant lawbreakers?

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 24 points 1 day ago

Laws are a social contract and don't mean shit unless enforced.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

Gerrymandering is a time honored electoral tradition for Republicans.

It's the system working as conservatives intended.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only legal mechanism for holding power accountable is the vote. Once that's taken away, you either accept subjugation or you don't. But the latter isn't legal and that doesn't sit right with a lot of folks.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 8 points 1 day ago

the latter isn’t legal

And a lot of people don't want to risk death fighting against professional soldiers, either.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago

All that kinda went down the drain with "Russia, if you're listening." They've forced us to rely on the very voting mechanisms they seek to undermine.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 day ago

Isn't there some kind of amendment about the security of the free state?