this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
14 points (81.8% liked)

Selfhosted

49553 readers
574 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jellyfin Server has a flatpak (and other packing formats too) version that you can easily install without docker directly on your PC. Would it make sense for Immich to do the same? In my mind it would be super useful, I could sync my photos when my PC is on and when is off rely on my local photos only since my main goal is having a backup of them.

Am I crazy or it makes sense?

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] darkan15@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 minutes ago)

In my mind it would be super useful, I could sync my photos when my PC is on and when is off rely on my local photos only since my main goal is having a backup of them.

You could do this perfectly with the docker version, so just curiosity here, why not user docker?

Is it because you don't want to install docker for only Immich? (you could also install other selfhosted server/apps as bonus),

would you be against snap? As someone already mentioned, there is a snap version.

If the important thing is having backups of your photos, there are alternative apps with different packaging formats.

You could make a request for flatpak, and see if other users also would like it, but you would have to wait for feedback from devs and understand if they don't have the resources or willingness to maintain it.

Am I crazy or it makes sense?

If I'm interested in a specific app, I see what packaging formats it has and see how to install it and try it out. Only if I'm having issues with it (that can't be solved), or can't run it on my specific distro with the available packaging formats, I try to suggest/request a different format.

[–] vhstape@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

My understanding is that Flatpaks are generally reserved for GUI applications and not command-line tools or servers. I’m not sure it’s the ideal format for Immich.

That said—and I’m probably going to get hate for this—there is an Immich snap package that does just what you’re looking for.

[–] illusionist@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

Nothing in Flatpak stipulates that it only supports GUI applications.

In fact the tutorial offers to create a CLI application:

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/740712/does-flatpak-support-command-line-applications

[–] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 4 points 7 hours ago

Thanks man, I'm gonna try it asap

[–] lena@gregtech.eu -1 points 5 hours ago

Snap is amazing for CLI stuff

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 8 hours ago

Immich needs an external database.

Jellyfin uses built-in sqlite.

[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago

It’s extra work to maintain and test another release format — and the core developers want to focus on making software.

No one is stopping you from rolling your own flatpak.

[–] priapus@piefed.social 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

If your goal is simply having a backup then Immich is probably overkill. Why not just use something like Syncthing?

  • for syncthing. it aint a backup solution. but it makes life simpler
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It probably can be packaged in a flatpak but it would be more of a challenge than using the docker package. You could implement your use case today with the default docker compose setup. You could be up and running in minutes. Start it with -d and it would even start automatically on reboot. It won't consume any more resources than a flatpak version.

Just try this in a directory somewhere: https://immich.app/docs/install/docker-compose/

As for docker itself, if you're on Ubuntu or Debian, you can use the docker version from the stock repos. The package is docker.io and for compose you want docker-compose-v2

[–] ISolox@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

I guess I'm a bit confused, immich does have a few docker containers available, I'm using one for backups and it works great.