this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
101 points (93.2% liked)

World News

32329 readers
881 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Moscow says its deratification of the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) is merely designed to bring Russia into line with the United States, which signed but never ratified the treaty. Russia will not resume nuclear testing unless Washington does, say Russian diplomats.

Nor, they say, will the move change the nuclear posture of Russia, which has the world's largest nuclear arsenal, or the way it shares information about its nuclear activities as Moscow will remain a treaty signatory.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stella@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago

Interesting that they're just being brought in line with the US on the matter.

We were "just testing" one on Ukraine!

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Nov 2 (Reuters) - President Vladimir Putin on Thursday signed a law withdrawing Russia's ratification of the global treaty banning nuclear weapons tests, a step condemned by the organisation which promotes adherence to the landmark arms control pact.

The move, though expected, is evidence of the deep chill between the United States and Russia, whose ties are at their lowest level since the 1962 Cuban missile crisis over the war in Ukraine and what Moscow casts as Washington's attempts to stymie the emergence of a new multipolar world order.

But some Western arms control experts are concerned that Russia may be inching towards a nuclear test to intimidate and evoke fear amid the Ukraine war.

Robert Floyd, head of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban-Treaty Organization, whose job is to promote recognition of the treaty and build up its verification regime to ensure no nuclear tests go undetected, condemned Russia's step.

The treaty established a global network of observation posts that can detect the sound, shockwaves or radioactive fallout from a nuclear explosion.

It is part of a disturbing trend in recent years that has seen arms control pacts scrapped or suspended, he said last month on X.


The original article contains 492 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

If it's one thing I know, we simply can't trust anything Russia says.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just sabre rattling?

It seems like the only one that keeps reminding everybody else they have nukes is Russia.

[–] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On the contrary, the US made mention of it on numerous occasions throughout their war in Ukraine. Putin never did.

[–] xerazal@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] xerazal@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I literally linked a Wikipedia link... It has citations..

[–] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is unintentionally hilarious.

[–] xerazal@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LarkinDePark@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Neither link shows Putin threatening nuclear attacks. You've got nothing at all. I can show you multiple quotes from Biden and others literally threatening nuclear weapons, Putin has never even used the word.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Could you provide us with an actual quote from your link where Putin is threatening to use nukes?

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Oh, I’m sorry little Vlady, have we been ignoring you?

[–] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 1 year ago