194

Spread across four computer monitors arranged in a grid, a blue and green interface shows the location of more than 50 different surveillance cameras. Ordinarily, these cameras and others like them might be disparate, their feeds only available to their respective owners: a business, a government building, a resident and their doorbell camera. But the screens, overlooking a pair of long conference tables, bring them all together at once, allowing law enforcement to tap into cameras owned by different entities around the entire town all at once.

This is a demonstration of Fusus, an AI-powered system that is rapidly springing up across small town America and major cities alike. Fusus’ product not only funnels live feeds from usually siloed cameras into one central location, but also adds the ability to scan for people wearing certain clothes, carrying a particular bag, or look for a certain vehicle.

404 Media has obtained a cache of internal emails, presentations, memos, photos, and more which provide insight into how Fusus teams up with police departments to sell its surveillance technology. All around the country, city councils are debating whether they want to have a system that qualitatively changes what surveillance cameras mean for a town’s residents and public agencies. While many have adopted Fusus, others have pushed back, and refused to have the hardware and software installed in their neighborhoods.

In some ways, Fusus is deploying smart camera technology that historically has been used in places like South Africa, where experts warned about it creating an ever present blanket of surveillance. Now, tech with some of the same capabilities is being used across small town America.

Rather than selling cameras themselves, Fusus’ hardware and software latches onto existing installations, which can include government-owned surveillance cameras as well as privately owned cameras at businesses and homes. It turns dumb cameras into smart ones. “In essence, the Fusus solution puts a brain into every camera connected with the system,” one memorandum obtained by 404 Media reads.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

How far can this type of intrusive surveillance go and still have the response of your average citizen be "I have nothing to hid". What happened to the America full of private people who greatly valued that privacy? The idea of this software grabbing live footage from city owned cameras all the way to live cell phone feeds, to door bell cameras, AND managing all those fields with AI setup to look for certain clothing or objects.

And putting all that power into the hands of fallible humans in the form of police. This has already been abused, I guarantee it, tracking an ex, racial profiling, you name it, this level of power isn't something we should stomach anyone having let alone the police.

[-] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

The answer. Privatised surveillance. Of course if anything like setting up ai cameras to monitor people was an official government act they would be uproar so instead they get private companies to make deals with each local municipality. We all know no one really pays that much attention to what happens locally anymore. We are so tuned into the bigger picture that we fall the register the enemy at the gate. We warned about face scans and the constant surveillance in China yet it seems to be quietly becoming a reality in the US as well.

Capitalism is so engrained in us that we never stop to think about what putting our safety into the hands of for profit companies even entails.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

What happened...

Nixon, Reagan, Bush I & II, Trump.

[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

You left out Clinton, Obama, and Biden, as if the security state isn't a bipartisan issue, just like neoliberal economic policies.

[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah! Doesn't matter what side you're on, politicians in general love privacy for the masses the same way gøøgl€ loves ad blockers for yt.

[-] cantsurf@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Now just combine this with cell phone tracking data and we'll know where everyone is, where they're going, what theyre doing, what they think, how much money they have, their political opinions, what they're buying, who they're fucking. It'll be a crime free utopia!

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago

He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast! Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.

George Orwell, 1984

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

And now we live in a fucking panopticon.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Ai Camera’s took over a small town

What the hell? Why capitalize Camera, why apostrophe-s after Camera?

[-] ripcord@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Especially since the article spelled cameras right.

Although maybe it was wrong originally and that's why OP's pltitoe is broken

[-] Onii-Chan@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

I don't like this ride anymore.

[-] Spinny@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

I want to get off Mr. Bones' Wild Ride

[-] Space_Racer@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Watchdogs from Ubisoft was right.

[-] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

software latches onto existing installations, which can include government-owned surveillance cameras as well as privately owned cameras at businesses and homes.

How can that be legal, or even possible? If you and your partner film yourself in the bedroom, I guess they're gonna tap into that too?

[-] Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

I'd imagine you need to point the software to a camera you own. In this case, cities would add list of the networked cameras they use to the software suite and let it do its thing.

I doubt this program is just scouring the net for unsecured cameras, but who really knows. IP geolocation is getting worse and worse by the year, so that's an unreliable feature.

CTOS Watch Dogs anyone?

[-] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

What a horrible design choice for a site. The first few times I went to that site I thought I was getting a 404 page...

this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
194 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

59137 readers
1815 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS