this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
186 points (94.3% liked)

Linux

53620 readers
1034 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been involved with Linux for a long time, and Flatpak almost seems too good to be true:
Just install any app on any distro, isolated from the base system and with granular rights management. I've just set up my first flatpak-centric system and didn't notice any issues with it at all, apart from a 1-second waiting time before an app is launched.

What's your long-term experience?

Notice any annoying bugs or instabilities? Do apps crash a lot? Disappear from Flathub or are unmaintained? Do you often have issues with apps that don't integrate well with your native system? Are important apps missing?

(page 3) 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Its quick and easy to install a flatpak which is the latest stable which is a godsend when the versions available through package manager are years out of date. Not everyone can compile from source or add an additional source repo. My only big issue is how bloated flatpaks are size wise and where stuff gets installed in my file system.

[–] radioactiveradio@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I try to limit the apps i install from flathub cuz limited space.

[–] snugglebutt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Don't really see the point of installing a whole other package manager, personally. If its not in the repos or AUR, I'll just compile from source.

[–] BoneALisa@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I just had to switch my work computer from Arch to Ubuntu becusse they want MDM on all computers now, and flatpaks are litetally the only reason i can tolerate it.

I now prioritise getting stuff from flatpaks, then the repos, and if they dont exist i use Distrobox to export any app thats only on the AUR for example.

[–] Maragato@eslemmy.es 2 points 2 years ago

For recent machines it works fine, but on older machines it feels slower than non-encapsulated software.

[–] Chaewon@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago

They are great, I use them over the native package whenever I can on Fedora Workstation. Can't say I've had any issues with them in recent years.

[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

They work great on linux tablets such as PineTab2 and rooted Samsung Galaxy tablets running PMOS. Often, games work better via Flatpak than from the distro’s package manager.

[–] deadcatbounce@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

Positive to the extent that it's my preferred. For graphical apps only, not sure I need to say that.

GitHub priority selection didn't seem to work, but I select that as a default.

Stable, a few bugs and the user mode addition/ removal is a bonus. I don't try to install low scored apps. I Gnome-Software and then Google for reviews.

Custom install of Fedora 38/Gnome.

[–] CuriousTommy@discuss.online 1 points 1 year ago

Generally speaking, it has been a great experience for most apps I use. The only exception is Steam, it runs well, but sometimes I run into a few issues.

  • This might be due to me using an NVIDIA GPU, but after I do a graphics update, my game (Team Fortress 2) doesn't launch until I reset Steam.
  • I like joining a third party MvM servers through the website (potato.tf), sometimes joining the game causes a second instance of Steam to launch for some reason...
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

It attempts to copy binaries onto a system on a manner that avoids the single source of truth used for regular installables. So it invites dependency hell.

Is this the one that seems to need a binary running constantly in the vast in-between times when no installation is taking place? That would be a risk.

Never used it. I worked in OS security and don't need that stress either at work or home.

[–] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

I avoid it like the plague. It's fat and slow, and the Arch repos + the AUR have just about everything anyway (I use Arch btw, in case you're wondering). I'll sooner build from source than touch anything flatpak.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›