this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
929 points (96.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9809 readers
22 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago (4 children)

When somebody pointed out that the glasses blurred spiderman's vision, this meme format was ruined.

[–] neoman4426@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you want a similar "glasses actually let you see the truth" format to use 1988 film They Live has a similar moment I've seen people use

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] moonmeow@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

you done good, thanks

[–] gornar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is superior!

[–] Sentrovasi@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

The thing is that you're meant to reverse the images. The problem is the number of people who haven't watched Raimi's Spiderman co-opting the meme.

[–] Girtablulu@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Yea every meme is destroyed because of this....

[–] nile@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

First thing I thought, I was honestly confused for a second there.

[–] i_love_FFT@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This, in my opinion, is the number one source of road rage: drivers unrealistically expect to zoom around fast, yet it never happens. So they rage.

[–] z500@startrek.website 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love watching them angrily pass me to only make it like 3 cars ahead

[–] vegetarian_pacemaker@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

3 cars? I've seen people do crazy stunts to either end up one car ahead or worse overtake me only find me again at the next traffic light

[–] astraeus@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think a lot of people get in these unhealthy mind tracks when they’re driving all the time. Passing subconsciously seems like it will speed up the time you’re stuck in traffic or dealing with uncertainty.

In reality, just allowing things to flow the way they will and going with it is a much less stressful existence.

[–] MostlyBirds@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In reality, just allowing things to flow the way they will and going with it is a much less stressful existence.

Or it would be, if you weren't still surrounded by brain dead shitheels operating massive deadly weapons like they're in a fucking demo derby.

[–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

I'd say it's more like a slalom. Your vehicle just happens to be an obstacle preventing them from getting a new personal best on this run.

[–] astraeus@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

There’s only so much you can do in this situation. You probably can’t fix their issues but you at least have a much better chance of being proactive in not falling into the same pattern.

[–] KuroJ@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re right and I get it. When I was younger I use to think I needed to switch multiple lanes to pass cars to get to my destination faster.

I didn’t drive aggressively and cut people off, but I noticed most of the time you maybe only save a minute or two on your trip, so honestly it’s not even worth it.

Now I’m just fine with cruising, going the speed limit, and reaching my destination safely. It’s much more relaxing.

Sigh I miss using the train when I lived in Japan.

[–] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Adaptive cruise makes this even easier. Also I use it to draft big vehicles like camper trailers on long trips and get 45+mpg in my Outback.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just wish I could control the acceleration on mine

It's good that it gently slows down when I approach cars but once it's clear it fucking floors it

[–] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah. Also my cruise control doesn't work well when towing a trailer on anything other than flat ground but part of that is the cruise control system and part is the CVT. You'll be cruising along nice, and a gentle slope appears. It won't react at first, then fucking redlines it, over shoots the speed so it goes completely off the throttle, applies low throttle when you get to the speed, gets 3 mph too slow and redlines it again. Probably my biggest complaint about that car. Overall I like it though.

[–] KuroJ@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

So true. These people damn near cause accidents just to rush to the next red light. I just don’t understand the amount of aggressive drivers on the road.

You’ll wish you would have taken your time once you find yourself in an accident and hopefully it didn’t cause the life of another person.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Happens on normal roads by me all the time. Nearly got rear ended by a douchebag in a BMW (redundant) because I dared not run a red light. Then he zoomed around me when it turned green, zig zagged back and forth across the 2 lanes for miles. And then we ended up side by side at a light way down the road.

Bravo, nearly wrecked a few times for a nice 0s gain

[–] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It always makes me smirk when they show a car zooming down a completely empty city street.

The only way that’s going to happen is if you blow through a barricade. I almost expect them to plow into a bunch of marathon runners or something.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's sad that you people don't understand that places like that do exist, all across the vast landscape of America.

It is reality, and it exists outside of major cities. I literally never have to endure a traffic jam when I commute.

The actual reality is that the freedom to roam is what a car grants you. It does not grant you freedom to roam inside crowded cities. You can't "roam" there because it's too fucking crowded but as soon as you get outside the city the freedom begins.

[–] Drop_All_Users@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its nice to see that the Lemmy fuckCars crowd is a little more understanding that cars are needed outside of cities. I live in rural Colorado and I can drive for hours w/o traffic.

For example, this photo was taken in the forest a few miles from my house.

Truck doing truck stufft

[–] Orange@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Nope fuck your car. You should be walking or biking all those miles duh

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The traffic jam is the reality for the vast majority of car owners. Most people live in cities, and they're only too crowded because cars are too big.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Actually the majority of Americans live in the suburbs, 55%. 31% live in urban / metro environments, and 14% live in rural areas according to Pew Research:

https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2018/05/22/demographic-and-economic-trends-in-urban-suburban-and-rural-communities/

Where I live is classified as "rural" by Pew's map but I live in town, and I have easy access to groceries and restaurants. It takes me about 20 minutes to commute to work by car. Life is good here.

[–] moonmeow@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

suburbs are essentially sprawled urban areas that are predicated on bad design and requiring a car.

Suburbs are design with the implicit assumption that people will need a car. No car and require public transit? Tough shit, good luck with whatever current routes may or may not exist.

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Suburbs are part of cities, and are the parts which have higher rates of car ownership. Being able to commute into a city by car is the entire point of a suburb.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Suburbs are generally towns adjacent to cities, by their literal definition and municipal boundaries. You are probably saying they are part of cities to fit the narrative that "most people live in cities" which is not accurate when you look at the actual concrete data.

[–] mondoman712@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

From your own link:

Suburban and small metro counties: These 1,093 counties – sometimes called “suburbs” in this report – include those outside the core cities of the largest metro areas, as well as the entirety of other metropolitan areas. This group includes “large fringe metro,” “medium metro” and “small metro” counties in the NCHS classification system.

And when I said "most people live in cities", I was including suburbs, and in fact its mostly suburbanites that I was referring to since they are the ones sitting in these traffic jams. People in denser urban areas, or I guess what you're thinking of when I say "cities", own fewer cars and use other modes more.

There's no "narrative", you just had a different interpretation of what I meant.

[–] ThePac@lemmy.ml -4 points 1 year ago

The traffic jam is the reality for the vast majority of car owners.

Citation needed.

Most people live in cities

Most city-livers don't own cars. If they do, they can go find open roads. They just have to get out of the city.

[–] spiphy@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

Bicycles deliver the freedom auto ads promise

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Nothing annoys me more than car ads where the car is in the wilderness like that. I can think of the range Rover one that's running now where they pick up hikers and drive them to the summit of the mountain. Like it ignores the entire point of being in the nature.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

You put the Spider-Man images reversed.

[–] GTG3000@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I mean, an ebike + light rail is enough to explore a city and it's surroundings, but I can think of a few places I've visited in my life that would be basically inaccessible without a car.

...or a very, very long roundtrip on train, I suppose. For like two of them.

Still, shouldn't need a car in an urban area.

[–] h14h@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There definitely have been, and continue to be, some great experiences in my life that would have been impossible without a car.

But they happen so infrequently that owning a car myself is completely nonsensical from a cost perspective.

Much better to spend a couple hundred bucks a year renting/borrowing a car the 2-3 times I need one, than $10k a year on payments/gas/insurance/parking just so it can take up valuable urban land to sit unused 99% of its life.

[–] GTG3000@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah. The only mode of transportation that I own is an ebike. And I could probably cut the "e" part out without too much fuss.

Good panier bags make all the difference though.

[–] moonmeow@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

tHe fReEDom tO wAnDEr

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I've never been on a cruise but I feel like that would be the case. Nice pics but I've seen people's real pictures and it looks like a public pool on the worst day paired with walking around a shopping mall that is 97% gift shops