420
The Republican brand is built on false claims about abortion.
Pretending its anything else is a bit gaslighty.
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
420 points (98.6% liked)
politics
19072 readers
5774 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
You could have ended the sentence at "claims."
But if we give billionaires one more tax cut the money really will trickle down this time!
Just give em' a few more dollars for the consignment fee and and they'll wire the money and jobs over right away!
"it'S uP to tHe stAtEs"
"When I'm president, I'll make those states not be able to choose" -Tim Scott, black man for president who thinks his party doesn't call him that word behind closed doors.
I know I'm coming at this from something resembling "rationality," so I could never pose the following question in a real debate with a "pro-lifer," but the "leave it up to the states" argument absolutely infuriates me with how stupid it is on its face.
The supposed pro-life argument is that life is precious/sacred and must be protected even if a fetus isn't [yet] viable. Why the FUCK would that be allowed to be defined differently by state!? Either all life is precious and must be protected nationwide (or worldwide) or their supposed reasoning is bullshit.
Because of course it's bullshit, just like the SCOTUS ruling. We either have a national definition of a person and citizen, or we have none. The current system doesn't make a person until birth when the birth certificate is filled out. States should have absolutely no right to determine differing periods of time to determine whether or not something is a viable, legal "person."
If abortion is banned as per evangelical wackos screeching "life begins at conception," then logically the state has to force itself into every bedroom, issue "life certificates" and apply for social security numbers for every single damn blastocyst, then arrest every parent that miscarries for involuntary manslaughter at least, otherwise the entire argument of life is bullshit.
But then the entire pro-life argument from any legislator is inherently hypocritical bullshit because it's nothing other than class warfare.
/bullshitrant
You're right, but you can make the point even shorter than that:
If life begins at conception, why are any Republicans suggesting anything less than a total ban on abortions? Does God suddenly start caring about "babies" sixteen weeks after conception, but doesn't give a fuck before that? Or does his "unconditional" love start at six weeks?
And why make exceptions for rape? The brand new "baby" that came into existence against the will of its mother is innocent, so why should it be allowed to be aborted?
I think those are literally their talking points in many cases though. I don't think that would work like you think it would.
The Republican stance on abortion would not be so popular among its female supporters if they realize that they could be charged with child endangerment for not getting prenatal care, not eating or sleeping well, or engaging in any risky behaviors - from the moment of conception.
Some people simply have no morals or ethics whatsoever, so they align with a party full of like-minded people who find that person to be a useful idiot while simultaneously hating everything about them. It’s that kind of dirty back-room dealing and self-interested politicking that is one of the cornerstones of the GOP. He knows they’re racist, but he helps the party and they’ll help him gain power and cover up his corruption and incompetence.
And when they all lose, they get to jockey for positions either in congress or on the cable news circuit with Fox, Newsmax, and OANN.
"Shit, Ohio went +14% to protect abortion?"
"Quick, keep saying insane shit about abortion that only digs a deeper hole!"
It cracks me up that they can't stop themselves from just reinforcing how bad they are about abortion. You've got strategists and some Republicans saying they have to moderate their tone, and then all the primary candidates lie through their teeth about abortion lmao
It's so funny watching these losers debate for a chance to be something they will never be. It's such a waste of resources the stages being built, the travel, the power for the whole show. Such a waste.
You literally cannot trust a word any of these clowns say. After Roe was struck down they said “we’ll just leave it up to the states” and now that a majority of Americans are making it clear state by state that they want the right to control their own bodies they’ve once again changed their tune.
“This is why a pure democracy doesn’t work”
i.e. let’s subvert the will of the people. Trump tried and failed to do it too. I’m beginning to believe the worst words you could possibly hear from someone’s mouth is “I’m a conservative”
The GOP would die if it weren’t for the strawman keeping its blood pumping.
If you want to fact check that group you'd be there all night
Moderator Kristen Welker of NBC News asked the five presidential hopefuls how they see their party’s path forward on the issue of abortion, given that they keep losing elections over their attacks on women’s reproductive rights. Most doubled down on their opposition to abortion, and then made nonsensical claims about Democrats advocating for no restrictions on abortion in any scenario.
The moderators did nothing to call them out for it, either.
“Let’s just be clear,” said Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. “The Democrats have taken a position they will not identify the point at which there should be any protection, all the way up until birth. That is wrong and we cannot stand for that.”
“I am 100% pro-life ... I would certainly, as president of the United States, have a 15-week national limit,” said Sen. Tim Scott (S.C.). “I would not allow California, Illinois or New York to have abortion up until the day of birth.”
Scott went on to say he thinks “it’s unethical and immoral to allow for abortions up until the day of birth,” which, to be clear, is not something that anybody is calling for, anywhere.
They had another debate?
Yup. Five dorks fighting over second place.
We all need to know, who wore the heels better and who was the tallest? Also, bonus points for incoherent answers to arm only interpretive dancing!
Shit, when Ramasmarmy mentioned 3 inch heels, my first thought was DeSantis, not the woman actually wearing heels.
Just goes to show how ridiculous our political system has gotten.
And there is yet another to come. This time on Newsmax.
The only place they may see ratings from more than like 6 people!
Ah, the fifth column doing exactly what they’re paid to do: create a narrative in line with corporate billionaires’ talking points. Eg: breed more disposable wage slaves.
Republicans got away with lying? At a debate‽ CERTAINLY NOT!
There was a debate?
Place these guys in a different country and we call them stupid .... conversely, most developing countries world call them average.