4
submitted 1 year ago by _calm_bomb_@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

This smells like IBM a lot.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] adventor@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Doesn't this basically straight up kill distributions like Oracle Linux, Rocky Linux, Alma Linux etc.?

[-] UrbenLegend@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Before we get too reactionary here, it could make sense to have people focus on the CentOS stream codebase for upstream dev, instead of Redhat having to manage upstreamed code targeting all the different releases of RHEL no?

And can't Rocky Linux and Alma Linux just simply get source code via the partner program? Or does this change prevent them from doing so? You'd think that Redhat would want projects like Rocky and Alma around as a taste-testing lure for RHEL, considering that Redhat makes their money on support rather than RHEL itself.

[-] nani8ot@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

RedHat already has no-cost RHEL licenses. The disadvantage is that it's necessary to create a developer account, and one account only supports 16 devices.

https://developers.redhat.com/blog/2021/02/10/how-to-activate-your-no-cost-red-hat-enterprise-linux-subscription

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
4 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

48008 readers
900 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS