532
McKinsey expects landlords to do real people work and innovate?
Have they met landlords?
nice
Turn them into housing
Well the report is from McKinsey so take it with an office building sized grain of salt.
Converting such buildings to affordable housing would be a great start.
Working from home could create massive value for people that matter while forcing a bunch of people who don't matter to accept lesser status symbol items like smaller yachts and less splendorous vacations that they wont be able to feel as proud as they are bragging to their friends.
Oh nooooo. Anyways.
I don't think the various stakeholders will allow it to happen in any significant way (see the article), but I've been hoping for an office rent crunch for a while.
I've always wanted a dedicated home theater that's just big enough for me and maybe 1 or 2 others. Upsizing my current living situation isn't feasible, but I could make a wee little 150 or 200 sq. ft. office space work!
Good. Bring back the small town.
Nice
NMP.
Maybe they should have built buildings that could be easily converted to residential or maybe they should have not signed 20 year lease or whatever. IDGAF NMP IDC FU.
Won't someone think of the real estate profits!
What if we turn office buildings into homes and allot some of that space to the homeless?
this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
532 points (97.2% liked)
politics
19097 readers
4671 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS