this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
277 points (96.9% liked)

Privacy

31868 readers
246 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Apple has said planned changes to British surveillance laws could affect iPhone users’ privacy by forcing it to withdraw security features, which could ultimately lead to the closure of services such as FaceTime and iMessage in the UK.

top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] athlon@lemm.ee 56 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Everyone commeting here saying “good, we will switch to X” is absolutely stupid. This law means no iMessage, no Signal, no WhatsApp, no Telegram, no secure encrypted messaging for anyone.

[–] rlhe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People completely missing the point for an opportunity to shit on Apple is on brand though. Lol.

[–] athlon@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Oh I think there is hundreds reasons to shit on Apple, but this ain’t one of them.

[–] vd1n@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
[–] athlon@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Great! If you’re technical and not have iOS. That’s already 50% of British market not using it.

Besides, it won’t help you if that’s a government mandate, and Google will be forced to take it down for the UK market from the store. Not a lot of people are installing apps from outside the Play Store.

[–] vd1n@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Too bad if people arent willing to adapt. I guess you'll just have to use paper notes and face to face contact, or whatever app your government makes. /S

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

I don't believe Tox has had a security audit so be careful using it

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago

Good luck enforcing that.

Anyway the criminals are just going to switch to something else so this law is useless

[–] leraje@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Either that or an app that has been vetted by government stooges and given the thumbs up as its trivial for others to access the content on.

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bullshit. Open source distributed messaging clients will always exist. The key is to federate and host in other countries.

[–] athlon@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, try explaining it to my 51 years old father. Or someone who really isn’t into tech in general.

Federated stuff will work for you and I - technically knowledgeable people. But we are a tiny fraction of population. The success of WhatsApp lays in its super simplicity.

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Click this link, type email and password. Federated services are just as easy from UX side. The complexity is the backend.

[–] athlon@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It seems easy, but the moment you ask the user to “choose their instance” - you already push away a lot of untechnical people. What is an instance? How do I know which one is good? Will I be able to talk to people on other instances (look at Lemmy, some instances are blocked by other instances)? Why do I even have to choose an instance?

From an UX standpoint, that’s a disaster. Stuff like Lemmy or Mastodon will remain forever a niche, because of that.

EDIT: Typo

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, don't tell your grandpa to pick an instance. Just link him straight to the registration page. Solved.

Lemmy is the same. Facebook is the same. You don't need to tell a user that their Facebook account is going to be shared by their geography. That doesn't matter.

Just link then to the registration page for the instance that you use. Easy.

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Good. Let's all move to signal

[–] leraje@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Signal have already said they will withdraw completely from the UK, as have WhatsApp, Session and a few others.

[–] vezrien@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lol UK losing WhatsApp. Yikes.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Whatsapp's the big one in europe.

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

EU when?

A service i would gladly lose completely

[–] citytree@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If and when Signal is packaged for F-Droid, how is the British government going to stop people in the UK from using Signal?

[–] leraje@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Knowing this gvmt, they'll try and prevent access at the ISP level. They've already started making noises about tackling 'the menace of VPN's'.

[–] damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They'll be out in six months to a year and since it takes them forever to achieve anything I wouldn't worry.

If you've got to have a right wing fascist government hope for an incompetent one.

[–] leraje@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Which would be fine except Starmer approves of all the things contained in the various bits of legislation.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

I never would've thought that the US would be the place for better privacy

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

How will that prevent people from using them?

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago

No, move to something that's federated and not run by a corporation

[–] zebus@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For real, wish I lived in the UK so I could get all my friends to adopt signal finally lol

[–] mercan@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago

Signal will shut down too though lol

[–] j891319@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The UK cannot believe every tech company will allow the govt to pre-approve updates instead of just pulling out.

[–] leraje@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think you underestimate the deep stupidity and tech-ignorance of our politicians, coupled with their burning desire to know everything that we do. This is a set of people who think hidden == illegal.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unfortunately both big parties tend towards authoritarianism too. The 'nanny state' is popular with voters.

[–] yip-bonk@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Clipper chip.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

This is a set of people who think hidden == illegal.

This is a fundamental shift in mentality that has occurred over the last 30 years and it's startling how many average people have bought in. There doesn't need to be a reason for something to be legal, rather there needs to be a compelling reason for it not to be. People have stopped viewing freedom as fundamental right, but rather as something granted to them by the government on a case by case basis.

[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No normal person would think every tech company would, but our politicians are bloody idiots if we go by their history

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why do they not see that encryption can happen in any form of communication even if they do get their backdoors? Are they going to make all encryption illegal?

[–] leraje@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that's the end-game, yes. At least as far as communication based tools go, which would include chat apps, VPN's, cloud storage etc etc. The ruling classes in the UK are very nanny-state and genuinely believe that a persons right to privacy comes a distant second to being able to rule over us and control us more effectively.

The issue for non-UK countries is that when world governments see that its possible to pass these sort of laws, they'll be keen to do the same. And most people are not tech-savvy, they'll have no real idea why it's important or invasive. It's difficult enough to get people to switch to Signal. Imagine trying to explain why breaking encryption is a bad thing for them.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Sounds insane. Another law where the only people it affects negatively are non criminals.

[–] yip-bonk@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any they don’t have a key to, yes.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

Wow. I was being sarcastic. That's how stupid I think this law is. Lol

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Do apple users in Europe actually use iMessage? I thought most users in the EU used Whatsapp or Signal

[–] leraje@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

All the Apple users I know routinely use iMessage and WhatsApp.

[–] papabobolious@feddit.nu 3 points 1 year ago

Telegram or Facebook messenger/Instagram chat is what I see people use in Sweden

[–] Contend6248@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They use it as a secondary service with couple of peoples, everyone is on WhatsApp.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

As a 40yr old Android user... I live without these apps. Hell, I might have even used them once in history...

load more comments
view more: next ›