this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
488 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

59296 readers
6443 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 115 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Such a bizarre chain of events

[–] Jay@sh.itjust.works 33 points 11 months ago

He was fired due to some discrepancy. Nadella said directly that he didn't like it. And when he can't use his 49% to bring Altman back, he hires him himself.

Without sarcasm: that makes total sense to me.

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 88 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Real bonehead move on behalf of the OpenAI board. The guy is emergency fired in what is basically a shock to everybody including him, then the company panics and realizes they just lost their star racehorse and starts talking about getting him back. It's fucking brain dead. When they fired him, he probably had a hundred job offers before he even made it down to the lobby. Even if whatever he did is truly awful, any company with AI ambitions would kill to have him on their payroll.

MS did well executing quickly here. They took a perfect opportunity to onboard an experienced AI team for pennies vs. what buying the rest of OpenAI would cost. And whatever Sam and his team build next is going to be 100% theirs. Wouldn't be surprised if there's an open job offer for OpenAI employees looking to follow Altman, with the promise of essentially unlimited resources to develop whatever and respect from management. For a talented AI researcher that's a tempting offer.

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 65 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It will also be interesting to see if Altman ends up demonstrating the dishonest behavior at Microsoft that he's been accused of at OpenAI, with the former inheriting the mess that those who expelled him from the latter were hoping to avoid. His reputation and other endeavors, especially WorldCoin, don't really give me much confidence in him, personally.

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I like your take. Altman is a Valley hustler, albeit a talented one who ran YC. But, he’s not technologist or a theorist, and I suspect he’s not that interested in attempting to de-risk AGI anymore, particularly now that he’s experienced the market hype. The staff who want to be billionaires clotted to him; the staff who are committed to the original ethical vision stuck with Ilya.

[–] whereisk@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (5 children)

My little theory is that he was in cahoots with Microsoft re some product roadmap, against the wishes of the board.

  1. Microsoft was not consulted re his firing as not to alert him or because there's no point asking the revealed adversary.

  2. Microsoft was "furious" and desperately tried to reinstate him.

  3. Immediately offered him a job. Effectively undermining their investment in open ai.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] silencioso@lemmy.world 76 points 11 months ago (11 children)

So Microsoft is going to compete with themselves? (Microsoft owns 49% of openai)

[–] sederx@programming.dev 53 points 11 months ago

"I play both sides so I always come out ahead"

[–] ButtDrugs@lemm.ee 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sam probably still controls a ton of shares, so I think effectively this would give them >50% of shares as long as they are partnering.

[–] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sam had 0 equity in OpenAI. 0 shares.

[–] ButtDrugs@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Wow really? I've never heard of a CEO not getting options.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lemmyingly@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Back both horses and drop the one that loses the race.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Eggyhead@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Watch them flat out buy OpenAI then just reinstate these guys.

[–] Melt@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago

If OpenAI wanted to sell out, they wouldn't have fired Altman

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] riaplus8@lemm.ee 53 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Isn't this effectively an acquihire for $0

[–] higgsone@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Pretty sure Sam and Greg got A LOT of money to get „convinced“ to start at Microsoft

[–] PancakeLegend@kbin.social 28 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Even if you start dreaming up ludicrous salaries/options, the cost to hire them would be only a fraction of the hit Microsoft would take in the market if not for this play. Satya could comfortably let them name their price and say yes to anything.

This hand was played well by Satya.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He would join Microsoft. So much for making AI to benefit humanity.

[–] TurtleJoe@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This guy is a former (and current) crypto bro who just pivoted to the next tech buzzword. This shit was never gonna be a benefit to humanity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yoz@aussie.zone 23 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I dont understand why these guys taking another 9-5 job. They already have all the money in the world. Just go travel, enjoy life but no these guys want to be bound by a clock and a manager. Lol

[–] Ithi@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Some people just want power and recognition which you don't get if you just travel and enjoy life.

I could also so it being pretty exciting being at the forefront of a new technology and wanting to put all the things you've learned or been researching to use vs just quitting and feeling like you're wasting that time you've put in. Probably doesn't feel like a job if this is the case.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Copernican@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Being a CEO for a company like this isn't being "bound" to "the clock" of a "9 to 5 job." It's a lifestyle choice for sure, and an aspiration for an even greater lifestyle. But they aren't bound.

[–] yoz@aussie.zone 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

CEO has to report to the board. So technically "board" is the manager.

Also in Sam Altmans case , he joined Microsoft so now he is more like "manager" who report to the director and director reports to CEO. Lol the pyramid sounds not so fun.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 8 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Some people, me included, really love our work. It isn’t related to power (for me), just pure enjoyment.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Microsoft slept on phones and tablets, they are not sleeping on AI. And good! Software has always been Microsoft's superpower.

gets the popcorn

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, good for them. Jury’s out on if that’s good for us regular schmucks

[–] guitarsarereal@sh.itjust.works 30 points 11 months ago

Spoiler: it's not!

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Software has always been Microsoft's superpower

You mean buying software, right?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Acquiring liquidated software

[–] paf0@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Or cloning popular software

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 14 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (9 children)

OpenAI shot themselves in the legs with a 12-gauge shotgun when they fired Sam Altman and Greg Brockman.

Expect Microsoft Copilot to eclipse ChatGPT.

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

They were right, he never opened the technology.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The Board though is unlikely to face any personal consequences though. 3 out of the 4 of them are CEOs of their own companies, with the fourth being OpenAI's chief scientist.

Regardless, this move will very much tank OpenAI since now the advantage is in Microsoft's court.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 19 points 11 months ago

I see this a lot, but two people, especially those not doing the work, do not make a company. They started something great, but hundreds of talented people have been driving the ship for a long time now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Microsoft has hired OpenAI co-founders Sam Altman and Greg Brockman to head up a “new advanced AI research team,” the software conglomerate’s chief Satya Nadella said Monday, capping three days of intense discussions following the unexpected decision by OpenAI’s board to dismiss Altman.

Nadella said Altman and Brockman will be joined by “colleagues,” suggesting that Microsoft is also hiring many other people who left OpenAI over the weekend.

“We look forward to moving quickly to provide them with the resources needed for their success,” said Nadella, in what many tech entrepreneurs labelled as an example of “incredible execution.”

Nadella, whose firm has invested over $10 billion in OpenAI and acquired almost 50% ownership, said the Windows-maker remains committed to the startup.

The decision comes after a tumultuous weekend that saw Altman removed from his role at OpenAI by the organization’s board on Friday.

“The board had a chance to explain their drastic actions and they did not take it,” wrote Andrej Karpathy, a research scientist at OpenAI, on X.


The original article contains 387 words, the summary contains 169 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›