this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
34 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16751 readers
551 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yay. More generic unoriginal games with procedurally generated huge open worlds that all look the same and bad quests / dialogues that just exist for the sake of existing.

[–] DrQuint@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

At least, if you put too much money into one, there's a threshold between those being financially successful or not, so if they flood the market, they will also leave a bunch of dead studios in their wake while good games thrive.

Oh, what's the threshold?

It's called Ubisoft.

There's not enough space for two of them. So it's beat them or lose it.

[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sometimes I wonder how fast adoption rates would actually be. There are tons of jobs out there that could be automated with simple code ten years ago.