this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
-7 points (38.7% liked)

Privacy

32471 readers
298 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It promises to be the one-in-all chatting app, based on matrix, providing compatibility to other apps (Telegram, Signal, WhatsApp etc.) through bridges.

So what do you think, from a privacy point of view and also user friendliness on the other hand?

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] borlax@lemmy.borlax.com 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think very highly of a cloud based app asking me for my credentials for every other cloud based app I used.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

if Lorem Ipsum is the first information i have about an app, i don't need to think about it. This is from their webpage 👉

[–] Alivrah@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Oopsie, forgot the fake reviews!

[–] Ronno@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Atleast it is consistent /s

[–] sleepybear@lemmy.myspamtrap.com 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

“For example, if you send a message from Beeper to a friend on WhatsApp, the message is encrypted on your Beeper client, sent to the Beeper web service, which decrypts and re-encrypts the message with WhatsApp's proprietary encryption protocol.”

So, not really end to end for most common use-cases.

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah I got my invite last week. But between the time it was announced and looking into it, I’ve balked and won’t use it.

That said I’m considering self hosting

https://github.com/beeper/self-host

[–] fulano 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was thinking it was something like what pidgin does on desktop, adapted for mobile, and was highly enthusiastic, but realized it works using matrix bridges and doesn't process locally...

Well, at least it can be self hosted.

[–] sleepybear@lemmy.myspamtrap.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Given this is !privacy and the advertise as front page features both “works will all your messaging apps” and “end to end encryption”, it seems important to flag currently those aren’t mutually compatible.

It’s not their fault the apps don’t have e2e APIs, it’s a tough problem, but the secrecy and privacy guarantee is just “trust us to stick to our policy”. And they’re a start-up, tooling isn’t perfect (or even exist), mistakes happen, etc

Their self-hosting looks interesting, but then it said to use your own clients too, which took the fun out of that.

[–] asap@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

it said to use your own clients too, which took the fun out of that.

You can use Element, which is essentially the same thing as Beeper's client:

https://element.io/

[–] Eigengrau@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

In order to provide the service, Beeper collects device information, including OS, hardware, public IP addresses, network routing information, information on the installed Beeper client, and other device settings.

🤔

[–] fzacq9td@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[–] Makss@jlai.lu 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This seems too good to be true, but deserves to be tested. Apparently, you have the option to self host your web service, in case you don't want to give them your data.

[–] noodlejetski@geddit.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apparently, you have the option to self host your web service

Beeper hosts a Matrix account and bridges for you so yes, it's possible to replicate that. their bridges are open source, too.

[–] freeman@lemmy.pub 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is. But their client only connects to beeper bridges. So you gotta roll your own client too

[–] noodlejetski@geddit.social 3 points 1 year ago

well, you could use an existing Matrix client, like Element. some people already manage their messaging that way.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Also the service is 18+. Most likely to avoid stricter data protection around children data.

Source: https://www.beeper.com/terms

[–] Alivrah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Isn't this just adding another potential point of failure to every single service you add to it? Hard pass.

[–] Echolot@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I like it so far, seems to work reliably and the client is leaps better than any other Matrix client on iOS.
Haven’t checked out the option to self host the bridges yet but it’s on my list.

[–] metaltoilet@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I've been on the waitlist for a while and am excited to get through. It may suck but it's worth testing. The privacy issues aren't ideal but it doesn't seem like they sell your data.

[–] BionicHippo@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Echolot@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The only good idea Ryan unironically had

load more comments
view more: next ›