Weird order of switch-to-buffer with packages that augment completing-read? (idiomdrottning.org)

submitted 11 months ago by Sandra@idiomdrottning.org to c/emacs@lemmy.ml

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Weird order of switch-to-buffer with packages that augment completing-read?

I'm using vertico, consult, consult embark, and orderless and it's OK but for switch-to-buffer specifically it kind of bugs me that the order isn't connected to the last-used-order (the order that list-all-buffers uses). I'm like "I just used that buffer three seconds ago and now I need to search for it?!"

Help please? 🙏🏻 ♥ @emacs@lemmy.ml

top 1 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] sequentialdesign@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

yes, if anyone knows, please let us know. I really don't like the order I get from that command when using vertico and orderless.

this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023

6 points (100.0% liked)

Emacs

2190 readers

1 users here now

Our infinitely powerful editor.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Berserkware@lemmy.ml

Zippoh@lemmy.ml