-4
Permanently Deleted (lemmy.world)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by yogurtwrong@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Permanently Deleted

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Floshie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 months ago

The only thing that I understand is that this war ages for too long, that there were too many casualties and that everything is not black and white, especially for this conflict. Just stop it ffs

[-] IbnLemmy@feddit.uk 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Mate, it's been longer than 10 years. It's like you started watching GoT in season 8

[-] IbnLemmy@feddit.uk 2 points 9 months ago

The only objective response to this discussion is to admit that there is absolutely no objectivity possible in this debate.

The world is neatly divided into two people, those who are with Israel and those who are with the Palestinians.

You want proof, paste some of the comments here into a mainstream sub on reddit and watch the shit storm unfold.

[-] Redredme@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What hamas did, what started this war, was absolutely unforgivable, horrendous and barbaric. It's impossible to support that organisation in any way anymore.

What Israel did which led to this over the last 10 years was stupid and very discriminatory. The amount of violence against the palistinian people during the last decade is well documented and inexcusable. Which could only lead to a violent reaction. (illegal settlements, violence against palistinians, discrimination, withholding electricity and water)

The rise to (political) power of hamas was a, self defeating victory. It made the position of the palistinian people worse, not better.

The return of Netanyahu, a convicted criminal if im not mistaken is baffling and unexplainable to any outsider.

The position of the west in this whole mess should at least raise an eye brow of the voters of our democracies.

Israels reaction to hamas' horrific action is completely out of proportion and the attack on the hospital was very wrong in every way. The amount of "weapons" found there means nothing in a war zone. It's quite possible that the weapons shown are personal sidearms of wounded palistinian fighters dropped off at the hospital.

The Israeli involvement in Syria seems to be aimed at kicking syria while its down so it stays down. This helps current Israeli military security but it's very short sighted.

Israeli mossad actions (killings of scientist etc.) abroad (iran, etc.) while understandable from a military standpoint do not further the Israeli cause. Short term it increased Israeli military security but long term it has great repercussions. It eroded the trustworthiness of Israel to SA levels.

Israel is on the stupid path for at least the last decade. Ditto Hamas. Hamas especially should be smarter since they're clearly the less powerful of the two. Israel should be much smarter then this looking at the history of the Jewish people and their state.

To me it seems nobody really red and understood the koran, the tanakh or the teachings of christ in whichever form.

But they do use those as an excuse to kill each other. Which is weird.

So.... Putting this all together I can say nothing. Looking at it from western Europe i see a gigantic mess which can only end in tears and genocide. Nobody is willing to give in, so blood will continue to flow. Until there is none left.

What I can say is: Pax Americana and the European stability will end, somewhere in the next century. While unfortunately for me personally as a European there are very clear markers all around us (if you want to see them, that is) that the current stability/status quo which exist since ww2 will not last.

Israel should take that into account. Plan for a viable future without american and European support. I don't see that. I only see very short term reactionary policies.

[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago

The goal of Israel here is ethnic cleansing with a minimum of fuss. The more Palestinians are killed, the more fuss there is - Israel's primary goal is to apply pressure (by, so far, killing 1 out of every 200 Gazans) to force them to leave and other countries to accept the population.

[-] dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 9 months ago

Why to you think Israel's goal would be ethnic cleansing, that doesn't make sense!?

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works -2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The ratio of combatant to civilian casualties in Gaza appears to be fairly typical for modern urban warfare. For example, here are the numbers for the USA in the first battle of Fallujah:

Approximately two hundred insurgents were believed to have been killed. The number of civilian deaths are impossible to fully know because of the lack of access to the city and enemy interests in increasing figures. Some estimates are as low as 220 while others estimate approximately six hundred, with half of those thought to be women and children.

The number of Hamas fighters killed is in the thousands, so the data we have is consistent with the 1:1 to 1:3 ratio of combatant to civilian casualties seen in Fallujah.

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
-4 points (25.0% liked)

politics

18874 readers
3790 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS