this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9789 readers
4 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There obviously more work to be done and I love that Chicago is so far ahead of so many cities when it comes to bicycle infrastructure.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] variouslegumes@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this the same Chicago that sold all their parking meters to Wall Street making infrastructure changes really difficult because it would cut into parking meter profits?

Story at the end of this great 99pi

[–] lntl@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah and I kind of love it anyway. Since the sale, meter pricing has sky rocketed which discourages driving. Fuck cars!!

[–] variouslegumes@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

I was thinking that might be a thing. Actually kind of poetic. Love it.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Discouraging driving is good but when a city can't close or repurpose roads because of a parking meter contract, it kind of sucks.

[–] roo@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

I live in small city where the exact opposite applies. The cycleways don't extend through richer neighbourhoods. The poorer neighbourhoods are plastered with cycleways. But there's lots of NIMBY people here.

[–] DoctorFail@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Can’t wait! Still would like to see fully protected bike lanes in Chicago. The waterfront trail is amazing though!

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok that's great but that's a weird reason to build bike lanes.

[–] Erismi14@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Chicago has a long history of segregation in the city. It's worse than a lot of cities in the US. POC are leaving the city in droves because the city hasn't well addressed the issues of the past. While I think wording it for pedestrian safety makes a lot of sense, this also makes sense in the context of Chicago

[–] iuseit@iusearchlinux.fyi 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice I can get shot on a bike now!

[–] feduser934@vlemmy.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The concept of Chicago being super dangerous is a incorrect right wing meme.

It has half the violent crime rate of Memphis, for example. And that violence is highly concentrated in particular neighborhoods.

[–] lntl@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

100%

Chicago is dope

[–] KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm thinking that unless they also add a program to give low income Chicagoans bicycles, we're going to see a crime wave. Just sayin'

[–] hihusio@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why? why would added bicycle infrastructure = crime wave?

More people buying used bikes to ride in the new lanes and fewer people selling used bikes (that weren't stolen) presumably.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

There are plenty of charities that can do that, if needed because really bikes are cheap on the grand scheme of transportation options. Only the government can add bike lanes, that's what they need to focus on.