this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
61 points (94.2% liked)

worldnews

5358 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.

  2. No racism or bigotry.

  3. Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.

  4. Post titles should be the same as the article title.

  5. No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

She told Swedish media that she will not be appealing the verdict.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Let me get this straight:

  • Destroying the planet for profit: LEGAL
  • Peacefully suggesting they shouldn't: ILLEGAL

The law has nothing to do with morality, no matter what anyone tells you.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I am afraid you have this very straight :/ I am so sick of our corporate-fascist world order. Big corporations are basically the worst dictator you can imagine, but with money dedicated to a PR department.

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah, imagine a 2D graph with axes going from legal to illegal, and legitimate to illegitimate.

Some things are legal although they are illegitimate (like 'Destroying the planet'), and others are illegal although they are legitimate (like some forms of civil disobedience or sabotage).

In an ideal world the two are aligned, but ours is not ideal. Also worth noting legal-illegal is rather objective, while legitimate-illegitimate is rather subjective.

I found Thoreau interesting on the topic, who commented being jailed for withholding taxes to not support the war: "The bars are meant to separate bad from good people".

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Sweden found guilty of failing to obey world's leading scientists and researchers' calls for immediate drastic action against climate change.

[–] Pinto23@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

arrest Greta Thunberg

We did it, we arrested climate change!

[–] frostwhitewolf@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Sounds like a South Park episode

[–] Ghallo@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Harriet Tubman was also a criminal. Just about every single hero was technically a criminal.

[–] MercuryUprising@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I'm sure if Harriet Tubman was active today, she would be facing the same sort of bullshit as Greta. Probably worse thanks to her complexion.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] bemenaker@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] gk99@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Of all the things to be guilty of these days, that's a pretty decent one.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Disobeying the foot soldiers of capital is a core tenet of climate protesting. This is akin to charging a band for making noise.

[–] tacosplease@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

She's getting into good trouble.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago (17 children)

her punishment was a 2500 SEK fine? They've just told the entire country that we can pay the equivalent of a new bicycle to block oil tankers, this is amazing.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] poop@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] reverie@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Based and gretapilled

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›