this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
125 points (99.2% liked)

InternetIsBeautiful

3402 readers
1 users here now

A place for your preferably unique useful or fun sites and kind of a bookmark manager for me :p

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gigachad@feddit.de 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Even if you already know that website, it's worth a click. It seems to me they have updated the story as well.

Seriously, without any conspiracy bullshit - why do governments allow "super rich" to exist? Who benefits? Cui bono?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the super rich buy the politicians who write the laws.

[–] kingludd@lemmy.basedcount.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

followthemoney.org allows those living in the US to track who is funding their legislators, committees, and individual pieces of legislation. Just in case you want to verify this claim for yourself.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's a dead link. Do you know the correct URL?

[–] kingludd@lemmy.basedcount.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It works now! Their server must have been down when I checked earlier. Thank you.

[–] Blaze@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago

Thanks, always a good reminder

[–] chaosppe@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Great stuff

FUCK that's a powerful way to represent that data. Neat.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Last time this was posted is how I learned that Jeff bezos, in a single day, earned enough to pay for all the cancer treatments in America for an entire year.

On an unrelated note..... A few gallons of gas really isn't that expensive.

[–] ed_cock@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

TAX THE FUCKING BILLIONAIRES

[–] letmesleep@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did they really have to use median income as a reference point? Numbers for median wealth exist. In the US that would be about 108k per household, so it wouldn't look disignificantly different from the 68k (median income) they used, but it would avoid comparing apples and oranges.