this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
140 points (99.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5212 readers
402 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kerrigor@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seriously. Climate change is the most useless term, it doesn't have the necessary oomph. Call it climate destruction.

[–] Mysteriarch@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think The Guardian has committed a few years ago to call it the 'climate crisis' (they also have a dedicated category page with the title). But yeah, language matters. I tend to use climate catastrophe.

[–] TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like the name climate crisis. It's formal sounding but conveys the direness of the situation much better than climate change.

[–] Ni@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm with you, I've started referring to it with this name. It's apt, we're in a current crisis not a situation that we will only see effects from generations from now. I talk to a lot of people who seem to think this is a next generation problem, even the current young generation.

[–] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is why republicans pushed it as the used term in the bush era.

[–] schroedingershat@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

"Hottest month on record" is a massive understatement when there have been 24 consecutive days hotter than any recorded before July 3 this year.

[–] Yondu_the_Ravager@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When I look at the weather app on my phone and it tells me of an “excessive heat warning”…. Yeah.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This summer so far I've had either a non stop smoke warning or a non stop heat warning. Or both!

[–] Yondu_the_Ravager@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yep, same here. The smoke was so bad there for a while, I’m glad that has subsided.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that's like everyday.

Shit we had an excessive heat warning in the middle of winter last year... It was like 90 fucking degrees. 2 weeks later we had snow!

[–] Yondu_the_Ravager@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That’s climate change for you. The extremes become more extreme, the weather can fluctuate near daily, and you can have events exactly like you described.

[–] Ni@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Era of global boiling sounds very reassuring. When are our policy makers going to actually start acting?

[–] shectabeni@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think we will see much in serious action until lots of people start to die and even then some will still drag their feet.

[–] Ni@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I really hope this isn't the case but I have a feeling you might be right. Why don't we act preemptively instead of firefight (literally in this case) after the fact.

[–] Mysteriarch@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

When we're at 'vaporization' I guess

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Don’t look up.

[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Since the media makes excuses for the rednecks who shoot up malls ("they're suffering from economic anxiety!"), I should get a free pass to slap the ever-loving shit out of a Koch brother, on account of my climate anxiety.