this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
41 points (97.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5245 readers
222 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The problem isnt technology, its insatiable growth requiring infinite construction projects. The system is the issue, the technology is a symptom

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 months ago

That's part of it, but it's also necessary that whatever construction continues to happen not add CO2 to the atmosphere.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The problem with concrete has long been that you can make carbon-removing-concrete, but architects won't specify it and contractors won't use it. Making it happen at scale isn't just a technical problem around material manufacturing, but a social one around getting people to trust the new material and use it.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, social attitudes are harder to change than material science for sure. Still have to just tackle it one step at a time though.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

We've had people creating carbon-absorbing cement versions for at least 15 years at this point. There are even ones where the end product is chemically identical to Portland Cement.

It's purely a social (and depending on the choice, cost) problem at this point.

[–] soupcat@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Seems like the sort of thing governments should be incentivising.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] soupcat@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

hurrah, now let's just hope they do like 100 times more of that, and maybe enact some actual meaningful climate policy and we'll be fine.