this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
288 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2582 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Maybe it would be a better idea to look for people that didn't endorse Trump the moment they lost to him to be his competition this time around.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/chris-christie-endorses-donald-trump-219861

Chris Christie is one of the current human embodiments of the meaning of the phrase "talk is cheap".

Not like it was hard to see how big a pile a shit Trump was back in 2016 so Christie clearly supported such a person then when he thought it would be good for him politically, what has changed now?

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

As much as it is opportunism, most of Trump's power in the Republican party comes from people thinking he has power. The more that stand up to him as he is weaker makes him weaker. So, I wouldn't be praising Christie, but let's welcome the progress that his criticism brings.

It does ring hollow, similar to the anyone but Trump Republicans before the first primaries he was in. It's looking for an alternative until none is found and then settling in Trump. However, it still erodes his strong man imagez which is blatantly untrue.

[–] saxysammyp@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bold words from a man who once endorsed trump while he was catching that wave. Trump didn’t do this on his own… he is not smart enough. It was support from hacks like this that helped him glide into power.

[–] orbitz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Trump was thinking the transition team was his money according to this article. . I think Christie was handling that team and raised funds for it.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“He’s earned every one of them. If you look at it, every one of these is self-inflicted,” Christie said Thursday during the podcast interview."

Wow, I never thought I would see an R say such grounded words before.

[–] CarpeBumBum@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can count on a Republican politician to say the right thing, but only long after it would have been helpful, and only after they no longer want their own name on a ballot.

[–] norske@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 year ago

Or they have a book coming out and they are tryin to boost sales numbers.

[–] pm_me_your_quackers@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One man lmfao this fat fuck participated and benefited from those crimes too

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, weren't they butt buddies for a while there?

[–] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It takes one to know one!

Christie is another one who would be in jail if it weren't for him and his crew setting up a couple fall guys!

[–] Xariphon@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Takes one to know one.

[–] donuts@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't believe I have to say "I agree with Chris Christie", but here we are...

Let's be real about what this is though, Christie is in the primary to sling muck back at Trump on behalf of Desantis, who plans on keeping his hands clean in hopes that he can take Trump down a few notches without alienating Trump's voters. This is more-or-less a cookie cutter copy of what happened with Christie and Rubio in the last Republican primary, and it worked like a charm, so I can't say that I even blame them for going back to it this time.

Will it work out against Trump? Will staying out of it actually help DeSantis build support in the party?

I'm not so sure, but I damn well know that that's what the plan is here.

[–] sorebuttfromsitting@sopuli.xyz -3 points 1 year ago

this is playing out like 2016, with a twist of new shit. all the old shit, plus new shit that looks exactly like the old shit.

[–] florganism@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Trump bad so vote for the party that kissed his ass for the past 7 years.

[–] onionbaggage@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

And you're... Not?