this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
95 points (85.7% liked)

Technology

59270 readers
3476 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google Will Turn Off Cookies for 30 Million People on January 4::Google’s cookie-killing “Privacy Sandbox” project is finally set to begin.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 183 points 11 months ago (4 children)

In place of cookies, Google has introduced a new set of tools that makes the Chrome browser itself keep tabs on what you’re doing online.

So instead of cookies which can be blocked or deleted relatively simply there's spyware baked directly into the browser. How is this an improvement for the user?

[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 73 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How is this an improvement for the user?

Wrong question. You should be asking, how is this an improvement for owners and shareholders? There’s money to be made somehow, right?

[–] treefrog@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago

OC forgot that we're the product

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 67 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It finally convinces you to stop using chrome, so an improvement.

[–] ilmagico@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Will Chromium-based browsers also have this "feature", or can they turn it off (and will they)? Or is firefox the only safe alternative left?

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I use a mix of browsers, but I don’t think all chromium get this automatically- most are forks from further upstream I think? Vivaldi is my favorite non-chrome chromium.

[–] residentmarchant@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

It's not, it just blocks others from tracking you, giving Google a stronger monopoly

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 months ago

The user? Why would Google care about the user? They don't even care about their advertisers.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 72 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Privacy Sandbox from fucking Google... Lol.

That's like a terrorist offering protection services.

[–] SimonSaysStuff@lemmy.world 70 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I get the distinct feeling that the EU will have something to say about a US tech giant baking spyware into web browser that EU citizens use.

[–] 3TH4Li4@feddit.ch 1 points 11 months ago

Google lobbying is huge in EU. Unlike Apple.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 56 points 11 months ago

What the fuck is up with this Google-simping headline? It makes it sound like Google is doing a pro-privacy move lol

[–] RQG@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Here is what I think is happening. Google blocks certain third party tracking cookies by default in chrome. They said theyll make a list to distinguish between what they call good and bad cookies. Also they'll add built in tracking for Google into chrome.

With chrome being the most used browser by far they can use that to sell white list slots on their list or access to the built in tracking. I assume that's what they are after.

[–] 3TH4Li4@feddit.ch 2 points 11 months ago

Like how they distinguish between malware and non malware ads on YouTube? If that's the "Protection" they're offering then I'll gladly pass on it.

[–] oDDmON@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

Looks like a good time to shitcan Chrome, and take a hard look at any forks built from it.

[–] krigo666@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

All your tracks are belong to us. /s

What a load of bullshit.

[–] Extrasvhx9he@lemmy.today 11 points 11 months ago

Damn they just keep coming up with shit ideas one after the other

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

Privacy and security under the watchful eye's benevolent gaze.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


For the past 30 years, websites and tech companies have used so-called “third-party cookies” as the primary way to track consumers online.

But most people don’t bother to change browsers, and if nothing else, Google’s shiny new version of Chrome is a step forward for privacy because it reveals less information about you and what you’ve been up to on the internet.

“We are making one of the largest changes to how the Internet works at a time when people, more than ever, are relying on the free services and content that the web offers,” said Victor Wong, Google’s senior director of product management for Privacy Sandbox, told Gizmodo in an interview in April, 2023.

These moves are a big deal because the vast majority of internet users are on Chrome, which means when Google is done with its cookie killing, they’ll essentially be dead for good.

If you see a popup in Chrome on January 4th, that means you’re in the test group of 1% of users who are getting “Tracking Protection” by default, which is Google’s name for the cookie-blocking tool.

Google is working to single out the bad cookies and save the good ones, but some things will inevitably break in the early stages.


The original article contains 623 words, the summary contains 207 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

If you can’t delete or clear whatever site tracking it will have this will have some unintended consequences.

Ex. There is at least one site that I regularly have to delete the cookie for when it just stops working with my login. That’s the only fix. I’d be locked out if there is no way to clear that kind of data and it’s for work. This is for a 3rd party service a LOT of people use.

[–] Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

There will definitely be a new way to do the same thing, probably would be even better way to track.