this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
42 points (90.4% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35791 readers
1007 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 74 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, that's the way the fediverse is supposed to work. It would be sockpuppeting for both of your accounts, say A@A.social and B@b.social, to have a conversation with each other on a third instance, say !politics@c.social, with which both a & b are federated.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 months ago

Or to both downvote the same things, or to comment twice on the same post in a way that makes it seem like it's 2 people. Basically if both show up in the same space and you pretend that each is its own person, that's probably sock puppeting.

Oh the other hand, it's not sock puppeting if the two identities are active in different spaces. If you use one account to comment on PornHub and a different one to post on LinkedIn, nobody's going to say that's sock puppeting.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

I would think it's fine since the new account would be subject to the rules and moderation of the new instance. Sockpuppeting is only if you are doing so for the purpose of misrepresenting your identity or to appear as multiple people (or otherwise using multiple accounts to manipulate or game the platform).

Not an expert, just weighing in.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Technically maybe. But sockpuppeting isn't bad per se. Lots of people (me included) do it. And it's accepted in the Fediverse and other parts of the internet. Just don't do brigading, other silly stuff and don't upvote all your own comments and you're fine.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

But sockpuppeting isn’t bad per se. Lots of people (me included) do it

Do... what?

Sock puppeting is when you have an account that you pretend is an independent user unaffiliated with you, and you interact with your own posts or get around restrictions with that account. It's called sock puppeting because you're in control of the puppet, but you make it seem independent.

If you personally are banned from a service and use another account to get on, that might be considered a sock puppet, but only if you're interacting with the same people / communities you were banned from talking to.

If you just have multiple accounts that you use for different things, that's not sock puppeting, that's just having multiple accounts for different uses.

[–] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

It used to be normal and accepted to have different account for different things on the internet.

Let's take a very mundane example you're taking singing class, great but at the moment you're quite bad. However, you want to exchange with other beginners and student from your music school. Do you want your sport club buddies to know about it ? An we just talk about trying to sing a scale on pitch.

There is tons of more "private topic" that you don't want evenyone to know about even though you want to talk about on the internet.

Despite what meta or tik tok think, separating account is great as it let you share stuff with a sub group of person.(also no doubt that big influencers, public figure and more have a hidden account)

It's still not that uncommon, especially on the fedi or reddit to split accounts or use throw away account for more private questions.

It's how the social web is supposed to work, so not a big deal if you do it un good faith

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 3 points 11 months ago

As long as you do not use multiple accounts to gain an advantage in an argument I think it's fine

[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Aelar64@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

Basically, using a fake account to pretend to be a real person. Here's the Wikipedia page which has more information

i sockpuppet quite alot

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 0 points 11 months ago

If you - rather than the instance as a whole, and for other reasons - are the target of defederation circumventing that would be sockpuppeting.

If your instance was defederated for reasons unrelated to your behavior and content, then no - you're simply creating an account on their instance.

[–] willya@lemmyf.uk 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I’m too stubborn for that and would prefer an explanation from whoever did the defederating. Like sopuli.xyz is defederated from mine and the admin doesn’t even reply on matrix about it.

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

tbh this is a general issue with the fediverse. Some instances aren't transparent about who is being blocked and why. It made it a whole lot more difficult for me to figure out what instance I should go for.

[–] Nerd02@lemmy.basedcount.com 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

PSA: you can use https://defed.xyz to check which instances have blocked an instance (only works with Lemmy ones).

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah there's a similar tool for the wider microblogging part of fediverse (Mastodon, Pleroma, Misskey, etc.) but because it was made by an edgelord it gets dismissed. I get the vibe some instances just don't want to share that information, which is important when you're basically dealing with web infrastructure, and get mad when you seek that information out.

[–] Nerd02@lemmy.basedcount.com 10 points 11 months ago

I get the vibe some instances just don’t want to share that information

Oh yeah, big time.
When I posted it to the lemmy admin chatroom, some admins who shall remain nameless commented saying it "gave bad vibes" and that wanting to know such information felt "toxic and gross". Everyone is entitled to their own opinions, of course, but considering the data is already available under the /instances page... well it's just weird that anyone would have a problem with wanting to make it more accessible.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

That doesn’t work at all for me. Search button does nothing.

[–] Nerd02@lemmy.basedcount.com 2 points 11 months ago

Sometimes it happens, yeah. Takes a while or multiple clicks to load. I built that site as a one afternoon project, it's far from perfect.

Another thing you can do is going straight from the URL. For your instance that would be https://defed.xyz/check/lemmy.ca

[–] ech@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Aren't all blocked instances listed in the "Instances" button at the bottom of every Lemmy page? You won't get a detailed explanation, but you can see what you can't see at least.

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah the detailed explanation would be very helpful. It's nice that Lemmy has the page at least (and I learned something new today), though that is just Lemmy and the fediverse is much bigger than that. I believe Misskey and Pleroma share it similarly to Lemmy, while Mastodon allows admins to hide it from the public (which, as I said, will act as a barrier to those wanting to sign up)

[–] degen@midwest.social 1 points 11 months ago

It doesn't help with the reasoning, but defed.xyz has been a lot easier to use than scrolling through the /instances endpoints

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If they're defederated and your posting from that instance they can't see your posts then.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 13 points 11 months ago

They said they are messaging them on Matrix, a separate app.