this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
299 points (96.9% liked)

> Greentext

7540 readers
5 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 36 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Yeah making it to an XL casket instead of an XXL.

[–] Duranie@literature.cafe 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Fwiw, many places charge extra for cremation over 300lbs.

I had to look it up. Apparently it is possible to cremate people significantly larger than that, but it gets tricky and thus costs extra.

[–] Russianranger@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I’m kind of horrified to figure out “how”, like do they say “well time to start hacking off body parts” or just putting them in a room and someone just grabs a flamethrower, then after the remains cool down a janitor sweeps up what’s left of Jeff and tosses the dust pan into a container

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

The reasoning isn’t at all what I thought. It’s less about accommodation of the body and more to do with the heat generation. Fat creates 20,000 BTU of heat compared to muscle around 1,000 BTU. So it is actually dangerous and a fire hazard to cremate obese people.

They mostly charge more because it’s slower though. Most bodies can be cremated in an hour and a half to three hours, meaning that multiple cremations can take place in a day. Whereas obese cremations may consume most of the day. So you’re talking 3-4 hours of cremation for a morbidly obese person. That’s not to mention likely needing multiple personnel for transporting the body or the slow cooldown of the remains. And then having to be careful of a fire hazard.

[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

At that size they can just drag the body onto a mattress and toss a lit cigarette on it. The flames should be self sustaining.

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 months ago

Yea, fuck that guy for even trying amirite?