this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
35 points (90.7% liked)

Guns for Leftists

1199 readers
1 users here now

For sharing and discussing about firearms.

Rules;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Halasham@dormi.zone 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The world 'legal' is holding up so much we might as well call it Atlas here.

[–] OhHiMarx@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 years ago

Right? I live in a region of the US where most of my neighbors are openly RW, armed, and publicly joke about killing people like me. And liberals think their particular definition of 'legal need'' is something I should give two shits about?

[–] Catfish@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Self defense air rifle 💀💀💀

[–] Ronin_5@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Some air rifles punch hard enough to kill deer and fire semi auto.

[–] huisjesmelk@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 years ago

killing fascists is self defence. we'll know who needs to die before they know we want it. you can absolutely kill someone with an air rifle.

[–] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 2 years ago

When the law is unjust, disobedience becomes must.

[–] Alunyanners@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

but what about my second amendment rights?! smdh

(no i'm not anti-gun, i'm just astonished at this meme)

[–] JoeDaRedTrooperYT@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Second Amendment pretty much says you have to be part of a militia to have guns.

[–] discostjohn@programming.dev 3 points 2 years ago

No it doesn't

[–] Alunyanners@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

but reich-wingers wouldn't notice the "militia" part

they think they're entitled to guns regardless

[–] Drillpin@lemmus.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It actually means that the needed weapons and firearms can not be restricted, so ,if the need rises, a militia can be formed.

So it's both?