this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
242 points (80.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43958 readers
1071 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I am one of the admins of Beehaw and I'm trying to get some feedback on our potential move.

Let's start out with a little Beehaw history before judgements are passed, please.

A handful of us were beta testing Tildes when we decided to have discussions on a Discord server.

We decided that our 'Northern Star' or guiding principle would culminate as 'Be Nice' with purposefully vague/flexible interpretations. Our overall goal is to provide a safe space to disenfranchised persons.

We talked for a little over a year and some of our members became impatient. Then someone stepped in to suggest a couple of platforms that we could consider getting started with.

One of those platforms was Lemmy. None of us knew, at that time, anything about ActivityPub.

During the Reddit exodus (surrounding the API outcry and blackout), our instance exploded. We were, initially, crippled by the mass amounts of users seeking refuge.

Thankfully, someone stepped in and volunteered hundreds of hours of work to stabilize our instance and refine it further.

After many hours of talks, it became clear to us that our overall goal could be achieved outside of Lemmy/ActivityPub.

Right now, we feel that Lemmy and ActivityPub have downsides that are limiting us from achieving that goal.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 38 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It wouldn't affect me in the slightest since you've defederated from lemmy.world anyway. As for how I think about Beehaw leaving Lemmy as a whole... I think that you have your own visions of what your instance and your communities should be, and if you say Lemmy just isn't a good fit, then it isn't. So just do what you have to do, I understand completely and I wish you luck in all your future endeavors.

[–] mysoulishome@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

Same. With closed registrations and no federation with LW I feel like beehaw doesn’t want me so I put it out of my mind.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 37 points 11 months ago (1 children)

To all the thoughts here already I’m going to ask something that may be wrong and may also be somewhat rude and or hurtful to the person/people it implicitly targets (which isn’t my intention unfortunately) … but which I feel is the tiny elephant in the room:

How much is the beehaw motive to leave the fediverse driven by a small and relatively unchallenged voice from technical person/people in the beehaw team who doesn’t like the fediverse and Lemmy for a bunch of technical reasons and who is certain that they can achieve better some how?

The relevance of this is that I honestly think the fediverse is somewhat plagued by the aggregate effect of the mentality of indy tech people to prefer to do their own thing and to find others’ work and cooperating with it/them insurmountable distasteful. Basically mass NIH.

Which is not problem on its own. Tech people do great things and being motivated to do what they want is pretty fundamental. Hell this is probably half of what’s going on with Lemmy’s development.

But beehaw’s goals are not technical, arguably not at all even to the point of being in spite of technical factors as a “safe space online for the disenfranchised” has intrinsic tension I’d say. And it seems that you’re very reliant on the technical heroes that have kept your instance healthy.

Which means their own technical tastes and motivations might hold too much sway and their promises might be too convincing.

I’m not sure this will help your reasoning, but I figured there was small chance that bringing this might help. The reality may be that the essence of the beehaw project requires fighting the nature of technology.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hightrix@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

Beehaw seems designed with the intent of being a specific type of echo chamber. And there is nothing wrong with that. But the fediverse wouldn’t miss yet another echo chamber.

Do as you want.

[–] jack@sh.itjust.works 37 points 11 months ago

Beehaw has already chosen not to be a part of the fediverse. There's no real purpose in asking us; only you can resolve Beehaw's identity crisis.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 36 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ikilledtheradiostar@hexbear.net 36 points 11 months ago

beehaw deeze nuts

[–] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 35 points 11 months ago
[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 34 points 11 months ago

Since you all defederated from lemmy.world I don't see any posts from Beehaw, so from a practical standpoint leaving the fediverse wouldn't affect me in the slightest. On a personal level, you all should do what you feel is best for you community and I wish you good health, good fortune, and good luck with whatever you decide.

[–] Joker@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 11 months ago

Do what you feel you need to do. Beehaw was my first Lemmy instance, although I have since left. What I initially liked about it was that there was active moderation and the admins seemed to do a good job keeping things running. It was a chill place that didn’t really appeal to the more toxic types you run into on the internet. It was like a friendly little bubble and a good home base in the fediverse.

While I appreciated that toxic instances were blocked, I felt blocking instances simply because they didn’t have great moderation was a little too much. It meant I was missing out on a lot of good content too. I understand the decision but I realized then that the original Beehaw community was more content to be insulated than I was. For a lot of people there, it was more important to have their own tight community than to be part of the fediverse. There’s no hard feelings about it. I enjoyed my time on Beehaw and contributed to server costs. I found another good instance that’s better federated and manages not to have a bunch of nazi and racist garbage so it’s all good.

These conversations have been brewing for a while at Beehaw. I would imagine a lot of the people who don’t especially like the insulated approach have moved on to other instances or created alt accounts for when they want to interact with the larger fediverse.

I don’t think anyone will miss anything if Beehaw migrates to a non-federated platform.

[–] Outdoor_Catgirl@hexbear.net 33 points 11 months ago

I'd laugh lol.

[–] 940036@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

Are you looking for someone to convince you to stay? Lol

[–] SRo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 11 months ago

That would be great

[–] d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

I already mentioned this on an old Beehaw thread, that Beehaw's vision would be better suited to old-school forums, like phpBB, Invision etc (no Discourse please, it sucks). Forums are more conducive for long-term discussions and offer far better user access controls and mod tools.

General-purpose old-school forums are mostly dead these days unfortunately but I see an opportunity in Beehaw for them to make a comeback, and I would 100% support such an initiative.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net 32 points 11 months ago (9 children)

it would be a net positive for the fediverse if beehaw left

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 11 months ago

As a non-Beehaw I would like you to stay because I like nice people. But I understand if you have to go.

[–] Raebxeh@hexbear.net 31 points 11 months ago

I would guffaw if beehaw defawed

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 29 points 11 months ago
[–] PaulSmackage@hexbear.net 28 points 11 months ago

Your website will rot on the vine.

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 11 months ago

I hardly frequent any of your communities, but I enjoy the contributions of most of your users and will be sad if they go.

That said, I would consider staying on - and contributing to - the Lemmy software regardless of federation. We are all experiencing the same issues with lack moderation and other features, and I hate to see effort go to waste.

[–] dandroid@dandroid.app 26 points 11 months ago

Most of the topics in interested in have moved off of Beehaw and communities have grown elsewhere. I probably wouldn't even notice if Beehaw left.

I say do what's best for you and fuck what everyone else thinks.

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 26 points 11 months ago

I started on beehaw but left for the current one, as I felt it was less about being nice and more about toxic positivity, very retrictive.

And since than I have not even once seen a beehaw community.

So id say go ahead, neither side likely will miss much, if anything.

[–] DengistDonnieDarko@hexbear.net 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[–] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 25 points 11 months ago

I'd miss you guys. I've jumped in on conversations on your instance a couple of times and it always seems like a nice place

[–] GinAndJuche@hexbear.net 24 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Have you considered making the internet a better place and simply deleting it?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 11 months ago

When you say "leaving the fediverse", do you mean leaving the platform/protocol altogether, or just defederating from everywhere?

Either way, I would think it'd be a loss for the community and the broader fediverse, but ultimately it's your decision. There seem to be some free speech absolutists ITT, but personally I think taking the approach of aggressive defederation is perfectly valid.

I'm curious, what benefit do you see in total seclusion?

[–] butsbutts@lemmy.ml 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 23 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Walled gardens rarely survive long enough for it to matter, so do what to wish.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] squiblet@kbin.social 23 points 11 months ago

I recall beehaw having some good communities when I was first on Lemmy this summer, but I haven’t seen much from there on Kbin or the lemmies I use - presumably because beehaw defederated for whatever reason. If you’re not going to be connected to the largest instances anyway, what’s the difference?

Sure, having a standalone forum is a legitimate thing to do, like it always has been since the start of the internet. Seems like it would be harder to grow the site without the network effect of the rest of Lemmy though.

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I'm on kbin, but have enjoyed the discussions I've had or read on beehaw. I've mostly lurked.

You're clearly trying to get social media right, and I respect that. Obviously it would be a loss for the fediverse if you left, however you are volunteers, it is your community. You owe the fediverse nothing. You should put the safety of your own users first.

If you do leave the fediverse for good, please let us know. I would consider joining beehaw or another forum/community to join/follow some of the discussions I've seen on beehaw. Especially discussions on sensitive topics that are harder to have in other parts of the fediverse.

The one thing I will say, is that leaving the fediverse will make you less known/accessible to people who need a safe online community. Of course, I suspect it'll also keep out some of the people who cause more moderation and safety concerns. So it's quite a dilemna.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

leaving the fediverse will make you less known/accessible to people who need a safe online community

I just want to echo this. Highlight it. Paint it on the wall in giant block letters in red paint. Light it up in neon.

The only way for Beehaw to provide a safe space is to exist in a place that needs a safe space.

*edit:

Interesting attempt at astroturfing here from a hexbear user:

Weak and transparent, but interesting.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blakeus12@hexbear.net 22 points 11 months ago

bye bye we won't miss u

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 22 points 11 months ago (4 children)

The fuck are you asking non bee haw users for?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 21 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I replied to another user, but I'm sharing it in a main reply to add my voice to the base level comments.

I want a safe place to be, while looking out into a wider sea of content (albeit through the filter of Beehaw’s defederation, which I really appreciate). When the trolls and the assholes get too much, I like to be able to retreat back to just Local feed setting and be safe again. If beehaw was to be a separate platform, I’d lose that.

Beehaw is a shining beacon in an ocean of content, good and bad. I’d love that beacon to remain, so more people can find safety here if they need it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Vode_An@lemmy.ml 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You cowards defed at the drop of a hat, just leave already snowflakes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago (4 children)

As a fellow lemmy.world user, I gotta say: Jesus Christ y'all are brutal lol

[–] OtakuAltair@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They somehow managed to anger both the communists and the libs lol, all while being hostile to conservatives (which is based of course).

That's not exactly a sustainable platform; you just get an echo chamber parroting already majority opinions even when they're wrong, and not many people like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›